TSLG vs. CRMG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

TSLG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLG returned 8.61% vs -54.14% for CRMG. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

TSLG vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLG achieves a -20.71% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -49.96% return.

TSLG

• 1D: 3.94%
• 1M: 14.75%
• YTD: -20.71%
• 6M: -14.74%
• 1Y: 8.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRMG

• 1D: -8.29%
• 1M: 15.68%
• YTD: -49.96%
• 6M: -37.29%
• 1Y: -54.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLG vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF	-20.71%	151.99%
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-49.96%	3.69%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLG and CRMG is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025	0.14

Return for Risk

TSLG vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLG

TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 12
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 16
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 10

CRMG

CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 3
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLG vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSLG	CRMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	-0.73	+0.82
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	-0.90	+1.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	0.89	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.12	-0.78	+0.90
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.24	-1.36	+1.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSLG vs. CRMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is higher than the CRMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLG and CRMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSLG	CRMG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09	-0.73	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.34	-0.58	+0.24

Drawdowns

TSLG vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLG drawdown since its inception was -82.86%, which is greater than CRMG's maximum drawdown of -74.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLG and CRMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLG	CRMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.86%	-74.38%	-8.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-54.61%	-70.91%	+16.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.94%	-63.39%	+3.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.72%	-37.61%	-21.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.54%	40.69%	-14.15%

Volatility

TSLG vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) is 24.39%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) has a volatility of 31.95%. This indicates that TSLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLG	CRMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.39%	31.95%	-7.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.58%	63.03%	-8.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.55%	74.67%	+17.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	115.47%	75.24%	+40.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	115.47%	75.24%	+40.23%

TSLG vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TSLG and CRMG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

TSLG vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, while CRMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF	8.26%	6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLG and CRMG in my portfolio?

TSLG and CRMG have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSLG or CRMG?

CRMG has higher volatility (31.95%) compared to TSLG (24.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLG dropped -82.86% vs CRMG's -74.38%.

Which ETF is better, TSLG or CRMG?

On 1-year performance, TSLG leads with 8.61% vs -54.14% for CRMG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, TSLG has been the lower-risk option at 24.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSLG or CRMG?

Over the 1-year period, TSLG has performed better with a 8.61% return vs -54.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLG or CRMG?

TSLG and CRMG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLG or CRMG?

TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 8.26%, compared with 0.00% for CRMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.