TSLA vs. PATH
TSLA (Tesla, Inc.) and PATH (UiPath Inc.) are both stocks. TSLA operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while PATH operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, TSLA returned 14.38%/yr vs -31.72%/yr for PATH. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TSLA vs. PATH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLA achieves a -13.06% return, which is significantly higher than PATH's -31.42% return.
TSLA
- 1D
- -6.56%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -14.07%
- 1Y
- 37.34%
- 3Y*
- 20.89%
- 5Y*
- 14.38%
- 10Y*
- 38.11%
PATH
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- 7.05%
- YTD
- -31.42%
- 6M
- -39.80%
- 1Y
- -15.23%
- 3Y*
- -16.72%
- 5Y*
- -31.72%
- 10Y*
- —
TSLA vs. PATH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | -13.06% | 11.36% | 62.52% | 101.72% | -65.03% | 42.02% |
PATH UiPath Inc. | -31.42% | 28.95% | -48.83% | 95.44% | -70.53% | -37.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLA and PATH is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TSLA and PATH has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
TSLA:
$1.38T
PATH:
$5.93B
TSLA:
$1.10
PATH:
$0.61
TSLA:
356.15
PATH:
18.54
TSLA:
14.10
PATH:
3.63
TSLA:
16.45
PATH:
3.12
TSLA:
$97.88B
PATH:
$1.67B
TSLA:
$18.66B
PATH:
$1.39B
TSLA:
$10.48B
PATH:
$115.98M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLA vs. PATH — Risk / Return Rank
TSLA
PATH
TSLA vs. PATH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) and UiPath Inc. (PATH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLA | PATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.01 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | -0.30 | +1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.93 | -0.54 | +3.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLA | PATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | -0.24 | +1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | -0.50 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | -0.47 | +1.19 |
Drawdowns
TSLA vs. PATH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLA drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, smaller than the maximum PATH drawdown of -88.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLA and PATH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLA | PATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.63% | -88.98% | +15.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.93% | -51.37% | +21.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.77% | -65.10% | +11.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.63% | -87.66% | +14.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.18% | -86.80% | +66.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.73% | -73.74% | +51.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.80% | 28.04% | -15.24% |
Volatility
TSLA vs. PATH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) is 13.89%, while UiPath Inc. (PATH) has a volatility of 20.16%. This indicates that TSLA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PATH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLA | PATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.89% | 20.16% | -6.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.83% | 48.43% | -20.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.71% | 63.54% | -16.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.87% | 63.64% | -4.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.13% | 64.26% | -5.13% |
Dividends
TSLA vs. PATH - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSLA nor PATH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
TSLA vs. PATH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tesla, Inc. and UiPath Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TSLA vs. PATH - Profitability Comparison
TSLA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.72B and revenue of 22.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.
PATH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported a gross profit of 341.45M and revenue of 418.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.6%.
TSLA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported an operating income of 941.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
PATH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported an operating income of 27.99M and revenue of 418.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
TSLA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a net income of 491.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
PATH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported a net income of 22.53M and revenue of 418.38M, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLA and PATH have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PATH has higher volatility (20.16%) compared to TSLA (13.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLA dropped -73.63% vs PATH's -88.98%.
TSLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLA and PATH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer