TSLA vs. MA
TSLA (Tesla, Inc.) and MA (Mastercard Incorporated) are both stocks. TSLA operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while MA operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, TSLA returned 38.11%/yr vs 18.35%/yr for MA. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TSLA vs. MA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TSLA having a -13.06% return and MA slightly lower at -13.70%. Over the past 10 years, TSLA has outperformed MA with an annualized return of 38.11%, while MA has yielded a comparatively lower 18.35% annualized return.
TSLA
- 1D
- -6.56%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -14.07%
- 1Y
- 37.34%
- 3Y*
- 20.89%
- 5Y*
- 14.38%
- 10Y*
- 38.11%
MA
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- -13.70%
- 6M
- -9.69%
- 1Y
- -15.62%
- 3Y*
- 9.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- 18.35%
TSLA vs. MA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | -13.06% | 11.36% | 62.52% | 101.72% | -65.03% | 49.76% | 743.44% | 25.70% | 6.89% | 45.70% |
MA Mastercard Incorporated | -13.70% | 9.04% | 24.17% | 23.40% | -2.66% | 1.16% | 20.19% | 59.16% | 25.31% | 47.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLA and MA is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2010 | 0.29 |
The correlation between TSLA and MA shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TSLA:
$1.38T
MA:
$438.53B
TSLA:
$1.10
MA:
$17.28
TSLA:
356.15
MA:
28.43
TSLA:
43.57
MA:
1.66
TSLA:
14.10
MA:
13.04
TSLA:
16.45
MA:
65.24
TSLA:
$97.88B
MA:
$33.94B
TSLA:
$18.66B
MA:
$26.70B
TSLA:
$10.48B
MA:
$21.23B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLA vs. MA — Risk / Return Rank
TSLA
MA
TSLA vs. MA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) and Mastercard Incorporated (MA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLA | MA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.89 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | -0.75 | +2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.93 | -1.54 | +4.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLA | MA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | -0.71 | +1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.28 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.68 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.83 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
TSLA vs. MA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLA drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, which is greater than MA's maximum drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLA and MA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLA | MA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.63% | -62.67% | -10.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.93% | -20.91% | -9.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.77% | -20.91% | -32.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.63% | -28.25% | -45.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.63% | -41.00% | -32.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.18% | -17.64% | -2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.73% | -9.82% | -12.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.80% | 10.19% | +2.61% |
Volatility
TSLA vs. MA - Volatility Comparison
Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) has a higher volatility of 13.89% compared to Mastercard Incorporated (MA) at 6.54%. This indicates that TSLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLA | MA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.89% | 6.54% | +7.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.83% | 17.46% | +10.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.71% | 22.23% | +24.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.87% | 23.98% | +34.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.13% | 26.92% | +32.21% |
Dividends
TSLA vs. MA - Dividend Comparison
TSLA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MA Mastercard Incorporated | 0.66% | 0.53% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.56% | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.44% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.74% | 0.66% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TSLA vs. MA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tesla, Inc. and Mastercard Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TSLA vs. MA - Profitability Comparison
TSLA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.72B and revenue of 22.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.
MA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a gross profit of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.
TSLA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported an operating income of 941.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
MA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported an operating income of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 58.4%.
TSLA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a net income of 491.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
MA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a net income of 3.88B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 46.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLA and MA have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLA has higher volatility (13.89%) compared to MA (6.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLA dropped -73.63% vs MA's -62.67%.
TSLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLA and MA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer