TSLA vs. FTLF
TSLA (Tesla, Inc.) and FTLF (FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock) are both stocks. TSLA operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while FTLF operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, TSLA returned 39.72%/yr vs 50.47%/yr for FTLF. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TSLA vs. FTLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLA achieves a -9.63% return, which is significantly higher than FTLF's -32.33% return. Over the past 10 years, TSLA has underperformed FTLF with an annualized return of 39.72%, while FTLF has yielded a comparatively higher 50.47% annualized return.
TSLA
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- -8.72%
- YTD
- -9.63%
- 6M
- -11.45%
- 1Y
- 27.36%
- 3Y*
- 16.25%
- 5Y*
- 14.86%
- 10Y*
- 39.72%
FTLF
- 1D
- -4.92%
- 1M
- 15.53%
- YTD
- -32.33%
- 6M
- -38.73%
- 1Y
- -22.90%
- 3Y*
- 11.70%
- 5Y*
- 18.62%
- 10Y*
- 50.47%
TSLA vs. FTLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | -9.63% | 11.36% | 62.52% | 101.72% | -65.03% | 49.76% | 743.44% | 25.70% | 6.89% | 45.70% |
FTLF FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock | -32.33% | -0.18% | 70.68% | 19.75% | -0.31% | 196.30% | 53.19% | 3,182.89% | 78.96% | -74.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLA and FTLF is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2010 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
TSLA:
$1.10
FTLF:
$0.68
TSLA:
370.20
FTLF:
16.26
TSLA:
45.29
FTLF:
1.79
TSLA:
14.66
FTLF:
1.56
TSLA:
$97.88B
FTLF:
$70.56M
TSLA:
$18.66B
FTLF:
$28.73M
TSLA:
$10.48B
FTLF:
$11.02M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLA vs. FTLF — Risk / Return Rank
TSLA
FTLF
TSLA vs. FTLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) and FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLA | FTLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.96 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | -0.40 | +1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.10 | -0.81 | +2.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLA vs. FTLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLA drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, smaller than the maximum FTLF drawdown of -99.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLA and FTLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLA | FTLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.63% | -99.68% | +26.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.93% | -57.23% | +27.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.77% | -57.23% | +3.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.63% | -57.23% | -16.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.63% | -89.06% | +15.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.03% | -46.97% | +29.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.72% | -70.89% | +48.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.06% | 28.39% | -15.33% |
Volatility
TSLA vs. FTLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) is 14.25%, while FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) has a volatility of 19.36%. This indicates that TSLA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLA | FTLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.25% | 19.36% | -5.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.73% | 37.63% | -8.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.49% | 52.03% | -7.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.98% | 45.37% | +13.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.14% | 305.80% | -246.66% |
Dividends
TSLA vs. FTLF - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSLA nor FTLF has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
TSLA vs. FTLF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tesla, Inc. and FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLA and FTLF have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTLF has higher volatility (19.36%) compared to TSLA (14.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLA dropped -73.63% vs FTLF's -99.68%.
TSLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLA and FTLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer