PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSL vs. PTIR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSL vs. PTIR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSL achieves a -9.40% return, which is significantly higher than PTIR's -46.20% return.


TSL

1D
-0.11%
1M
9.37%
YTD
-9.40%
6M
-9.11%
1Y
20.41%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
10Y*

PTIR

1D
-13.01%
1M
-8.99%
YTD
-46.20%
6M
-46.23%
1Y
-21.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSL vs. PTIR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSL
GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF
-9.40%3.49%106.51%
PTIR
GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF
-46.20%221.36%425.36%

Correlation

The correlation between TSL and PTIR is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024

0.41

TSL vs. PTIR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TSL
PTIR

Consumer Cyclical

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

TSL
100.0%
PTIR

-

Basic Materials

TSL

-

PTIR

-

Communication Services

TSL

-

PTIR

-

Consumer Defensive

TSL

-

PTIR

-

Energy

TSL

-

PTIR

-

Financial Services

TSL

-

PTIR

-

Healthcare

TSL

-

PTIR

-

Industrials

TSL

-

PTIR

-

Real Estate

TSL

-

PTIR

-

Technology

TSL

-

PTIR
100.0%

Utilities

TSL

-

PTIR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSL vs. PTIR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSL
TSL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSL Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSL Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

PTIR
PTIR Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PTIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTIR Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PTIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTIR Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSL vs. PTIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLPTIRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.05

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

-0.32

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.26

-0.55

+1.80

TSL vs. PTIR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSL Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is higher than the PTIR Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSL and PTIR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLPTIRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

-0.21

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

1.98

-1.95

Drawdowns

TSL vs. PTIR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSL drawdown since its inception was -74.52%, which is greater than PTIR's maximum drawdown of -69.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSL and PTIR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLPTIRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.52%

-69.10%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.98%

-68.11%

+31.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.91%

-62.92%

+38.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.71%

-27.47%

-11.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.38%

39.55%

-23.17%

Volatility

TSL vs. PTIR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) is 15.25%, while GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a volatility of 36.75%. This indicates that TSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTIR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLPTIRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.25%

36.75%

-21.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.12%

77.20%

-43.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.94%

103.10%

-45.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.18%

129.58%

-56.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.18%

129.58%

-56.40%

TSL vs. PTIR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TSL and PTIR have an expense ratio of 1.15%.


Dividends

TSL vs. PTIR - Dividend Comparison

TSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.80%.


PositionTTM202520242023
PTIR
GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF
10.80%5.81%0.00%0.00%
TSL
GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%60.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSL and PTIR have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTIR has higher volatility (36.75%) compared to TSL (15.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSL dropped -74.52% vs PTIR's -69.10%.

On 1-year performance, TSL leads with 20.41% vs -21.52% for PTIR. Both ETFs have the same 1.15% expense ratio. On volatility, TSL has been the lower-risk option at 15.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSL has performed better with a 20.41% return vs -21.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSL and PTIR have the same expense ratio: 1.15% per year.

PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 10.80%, compared with 0.00% for TSL.

TSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSL and PTIR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer