TSL vs. IFED
TSL (GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF) and IFED (ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TSL is actively managed, while IFED is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSL returned 0.02%/yr vs 18.28%/yr for IFED. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TSL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IFED.
Performance
TSL vs. IFED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSL achieves a -36.68% return, which is significantly lower than IFED's 6.57% return.
TSL
- 1D
- 4.19%
- 1M
- -22.91%
- 6M
- -31.12%
- YTD
- -36.68%
- 1Y
- 0.94%
- 3Y*
- 0.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -7.13%
IFED
- 1D
- -3.14%
- 1M
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- YTD
- 6.57%
- 1Y
- 11.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.62%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $137.39K | $84.48K | $45.67K | |
| $7.63M | $7.71M | $12.52M |
TSL vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | -36.68% | 3.49% | 64.12% | 113.79% | -67.61% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | 6.57% | 15.02% | 23.04% | 20.78% | -2.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSL and IFED is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022 | 0.41 |
The correlation between TSL and IFED shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSL vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank
TSL
IFED
TSL vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSL | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.13 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.02 | 0.56 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.05 | 1.73 | -1.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSL vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSL drawdown since its inception was -74.52%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSL and IFED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSL | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.52% | -22.36% | -52.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.38% | -20.18% | -28.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.30% | -22.36% | -40.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.52% | -10.51% | -37.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.51% | -5.85% | -32.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.82% | 6.47% | +13.35% |
Volatility
TSL vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) have volatilities of 25.38% and 24.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSL | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.38% | 24.37% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.47% | 28.13% | +15.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.91% | 29.53% | +28.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.44% | 22.60% | +50.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.44% | 22.60% | +50.84% |
TSL vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSL vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSL nor IFED has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 60.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSL and IFED have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSL has higher volatility (25.38%) compared to IFED (24.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSL dropped -74.52% vs IFED's -22.36%.
On 3-year performance, IFED leads with 18.28% vs 0.02% for TSL. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, IFED has been the lower-risk option at 24.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IFED has performed better with a 18.28% return vs 0.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSL.
TSL and IFED have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSL and 0.45% for IFED.
IFED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSL and IFED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer