TSL vs. DLLL
TSL (GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF) and DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. TSL is actively managed, while DLLL is passively managed. Over the past year, TSL returned 20.41% vs 850.63% for DLLL. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSL charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DLLL.
Performance
TSL vs. DLLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSL achieves a -9.40% return, which is significantly lower than DLLL's 757.76% return.
TSL
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 9.37%
- YTD
- -9.40%
- 6M
- -9.11%
- 1Y
- 20.41%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DLLL
- 1D
- -6.45%
- 1M
- 245.92%
- YTD
- 757.76%
- 6M
- 648.38%
- 1Y
- 850.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSL vs. DLLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | -9.40% | 22.14% |
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 757.76% | -3.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSL and DLLL is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025 | 0.32 |
The correlation between TSL and DLLL shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TSL vs. DLLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSL
DLLL
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
TSL
DLLL
-
Basic Materials
TSL
-
DLLL
-
Communication Services
TSL
-
DLLL
-
Consumer Defensive
TSL
-
DLLL
-
Energy
TSL
-
DLLL
-
Financial Services
TSL
-
DLLL
-
Healthcare
TSL
-
DLLL
-
Industrials
TSL
-
DLLL
-
Real Estate
TSL
-
DLLL
-
Technology
TSL
-
DLLL
Utilities
TSL
-
DLLL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSL vs. DLLL — Risk / Return Rank
TSL
DLLL
TSL vs. DLLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSL | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.60 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 15.02 | -14.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.26 | 31.34 | -30.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSL | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 6.65 | -6.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 3.16 | -3.12 |
Drawdowns
TSL vs. DLLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSL drawdown since its inception was -74.52%, which is greater than DLLL's maximum drawdown of -68.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSL and DLLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSL | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.52% | -68.58% | -5.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.98% | -57.19% | +20.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.91% | -18.86% | -6.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.71% | -25.91% | -12.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.38% | 27.36% | -10.98% |
Volatility
TSL vs. DLLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) is 15.25%, while GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a volatility of 69.39%. This indicates that TSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DLLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSL | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.25% | 69.39% | -54.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.12% | 102.08% | -67.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.94% | 129.28% | -71.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.18% | 130.55% | -57.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.18% | 130.55% | -57.37% |
TSL vs. DLLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DLLL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSL vs. DLLL - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSL nor DLLL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 60.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSL and DLLL have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DLLL has higher volatility (69.39%) compared to TSL (15.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSL dropped -74.52% vs DLLL's -68.58%.
On 1-year performance, DLLL leads with 850.63% vs 20.41% for TSL. On fees, TSL is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, TSL has been the lower-risk option at 15.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DLLL has performed better with a 850.63% return vs 20.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSL is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.
TSL and DLLL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSL and 1.50% for DLLL.
DLLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.65 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSL and DLLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer