TSL vs. COIG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TSL (GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF) and COIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSL returned 20.41% vs -79.30% for COIG. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COIG.

Performance

TSL vs. COIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSL achieves a -9.40% return, which is significantly higher than COIG's -61.85% return.

TSL

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 9.37%
• YTD: -9.40%
• 6M: -9.11%
• 1Y: 20.41%
• 3Y*: 20.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COIG

• 1D: -11.21%
• 1M: -37.91%
• YTD: -61.85%
• 6M: -75.19%
• 1Y: -79.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSL vs. COIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF	-9.40%	92.78%
COIG Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF	-61.85%	-9.46%

Correlation

The correlation between TSL and COIG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2025	0.46

Return for Risk

TSL vs. COIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSL

TSL Risk / Return Rank: 16
TSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
TSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
TSL Omega Ratio Rank: 17
TSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
TSL Martin Ratio Rank: 15

COIG

COIG Risk / Return Rank: 3
COIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
COIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
COIG Omega Ratio Rank: 4
COIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
COIG Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSL vs. COIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSL	COIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	-0.57	+0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.87	-0.66	+1.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	0.93	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.55	-0.86	+1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.26	-1.20	+2.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSL vs. COIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSL Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is higher than the COIG Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSL and COIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSL	COIG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35	-0.57	+0.93
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	-0.40	+0.43

Drawdowns

TSL vs. COIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSL drawdown since its inception was -74.52%, smaller than the maximum COIG drawdown of -92.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSL and COIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSL	COIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.52%	-92.06%	+17.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.98%	-92.06%	+55.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-63.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.91%	-91.42%	+66.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.71%	-51.70%	+12.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.38%	65.88%	-49.50%

Volatility

TSL vs. COIG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF (TSL) is 15.25%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) has a volatility of 37.85%. This indicates that TSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSL	COIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.25%	37.85%	-22.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.12%	100.21%	-66.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.94%	139.35%	-81.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.18%	146.45%	-73.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.18%	146.45%	-73.27%

TSL vs. COIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than COIG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSL vs. COIG - Dividend Comparison

Neither TSL nor COIG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
COIG Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TSL GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	60.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSL and COIG in my portfolio?

TSL and COIG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSL or COIG?

COIG has higher volatility (37.85%) compared to TSL (15.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSL dropped -74.52% vs COIG's -92.06%.

Which ETF is better, TSL or COIG?

On 1-year performance, TSL leads with 20.41% vs -79.30% for COIG. On fees, COIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TSL has been the lower-risk option at 15.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSL or COIG?

Over the 1-year period, TSL has performed better with a 20.41% return vs -79.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSL or COIG?

COIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSL or COIG?

TSL and COIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TSL and COIG?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSL and 0.75% for COIG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.