PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSIIX vs. THCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSIIX vs. THCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Strategic Income Fund (TSIIX) and Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (THCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSIIX achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than THCGX's 15.08% return. Over the past 10 years, TSIIX has underperformed THCGX with an annualized return of 4.07%, while THCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.89% annualized return.


TSIIX

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.61%
6M
0.46%
YTD
0.62%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
5.60%
5Y*
2.79%
10Y*
4.07%
ALL TIME*
5.82%

THCGX

1D
2.70%
1M
1.61%
6M
20.00%
YTD
15.08%
1Y
25.66%
3Y*
13.66%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
8.89%
ALL TIME*
7.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TSIIX vs. THCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSIIX
Thornburg Strategic Income Fund
0.62%7.58%4.85%7.63%-6.44%2.80%8.27%7.92%0.70%6.48%
THCGX
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
15.08%4.31%19.67%19.56%-34.19%-4.97%41.70%28.95%-2.56%23.91%

Correlation

The correlation between TSIIX and THCGX is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2007

0.25

The correlation between TSIIX and THCGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (10 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSIIX vs. THCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSIIX
TSIIX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TSIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
TSIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

THCGX
THCGX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
THCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
THCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
THCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
THCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSIIX vs. THCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Strategic Income Fund (TSIIX) and Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (THCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSIIXTHCGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.20

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

1.52

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.86

4.86

-0.01

TSIIX vs. THCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the THCGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSIIX and THCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSIIX vs. THCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSIIX drawdown since its inception was -21.98%, smaller than the maximum THCGX drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSIIX and THCGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSIIXTHCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.98%

-63.67%

+41.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.14%

-15.53%

+13.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.56%

-30.25%

+27.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.40%

-63.67%

+54.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.58%

-63.67%

+54.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-31.86%

+31.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-21.31%

+19.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

4.85%

-4.19%

Volatility

TSIIX vs. THCGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thornburg Strategic Income Fund (TSIIX) is 0.71%, while Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (THCGX) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that TSIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSIIXTHCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

7.26%

-6.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.12%

15.70%

-13.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65%

20.87%

-18.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.39%

37.09%

-33.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.96%

30.19%

-27.23%

TSIIX vs. THCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSIIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than THCGX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSIIX vs. THCGX - Dividend Comparison

TSIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, while THCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
THCGX
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%54.25%6.23%9.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSIIX
Thornburg Strategic Income Fund
4.50%4.99%5.10%4.50%3.49%4.17%3.70%3.82%3.40%3.59%3.43%4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSIIX and THCGX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THCGX has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to TSIIX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSIIX dropped -21.98% vs THCGX's -63.67%.

TSIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSIIX and THCGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer