PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TSIIX vs. FCFAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


TSIIXFCFAX
YTD Return4.90%7.93%
1Y Return9.50%12.97%
3Y Return (Ann)1.82%3.45%
5Y Return (Ann)3.53%4.62%
10Y Return (Ann)3.43%4.15%
Sharpe Ratio2.454.95
Sortino Ratio3.828.41
Omega Ratio1.482.17
Calmar Ratio2.506.25
Martin Ratio12.5343.14
Ulcer Index0.72%0.29%
Daily Std Dev3.67%2.57%
Max Drawdown-24.71%-16.33%
Current Drawdown-1.44%-0.25%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between TSIIX and FCFAX is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

TSIIX vs. FCFAX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, TSIIX achieves a 4.90% return, which is significantly lower than FCFAX's 7.93% return. Over the past 10 years, TSIIX has underperformed FCFAX with an annualized return of 3.43%, while FCFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.15% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.37%
4.88%
TSIIX
FCFAX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TSIIX vs. FCFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSIIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FCFAX's 0.96% expense ratio.


FCFAX
Frost Credit Fund
Expense ratio chart for FCFAX: current value at 0.96% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.96%
Expense ratio chart for TSIIX: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TSIIX vs. FCFAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Strategic Income Fund (TSIIX) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSIIX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TSIIX, currently valued at 2.45, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TSIIX, currently valued at 3.82, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.82
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TSIIX, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.48
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TSIIX, currently valued at 2.50, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.002.50
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TSIIX, currently valued at 12.53, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0012.53
FCFAX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FCFAX, currently valued at 4.95, compared to the broader market0.002.004.004.95
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FCFAX, currently valued at 8.41, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.008.41
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FCFAX, currently valued at 2.17, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.002.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FCFAX, currently valued at 6.25, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.006.25
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FCFAX, currently valued at 43.14, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0043.14

TSIIX vs. FCFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSIIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is lower than the FCFAX Sharpe Ratio of 4.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSIIX and FCFAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.006.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.45
4.95
TSIIX
FCFAX

Dividends

TSIIX vs. FCFAX - Dividend Comparison

TSIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, less than FCFAX's 5.79% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
TSIIX
Thornburg Strategic Income Fund
4.93%4.50%3.81%3.94%3.71%3.83%3.42%3.60%3.42%4.26%4.52%5.68%
FCFAX
Frost Credit Fund
5.79%5.95%4.99%3.64%3.70%4.63%4.68%4.60%4.85%4.96%4.56%3.81%

Drawdowns

TSIIX vs. FCFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSIIX drawdown since its inception was -24.71%, which is greater than FCFAX's maximum drawdown of -16.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSIIX and FCFAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-2.00%-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.44%
-0.25%
TSIIX
FCFAX

Volatility

TSIIX vs. FCFAX - Volatility Comparison

Thornburg Strategic Income Fund (TSIIX) has a higher volatility of 0.97% compared to Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) at 0.78%. This indicates that TSIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.40%0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.97%
0.78%
TSIIX
FCFAX