PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSIIX vs. JMSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Strategic Income Fund (TSIIX) and JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSIIX achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than JMSIX's 1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, TSIIX has outperformed JMSIX with an annualized return of 4.28%, while JMSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.95% annualized return.


TSIIX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.78%
YTD
0.81%
6M
1.23%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
5.90%
5Y*
3.00%
10Y*
4.28%

JMSIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.62%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.73%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
7.12%
5Y*
2.84%
10Y*
3.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSIIX
Thornburg Strategic Income Fund
0.81%7.58%4.85%7.63%-6.44%2.80%8.27%7.92%0.70%6.48%
JMSIX
JPMorgan Income Fund
1.11%7.68%7.78%6.14%-8.24%3.59%3.07%11.82%1.03%6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between TSIIX and JMSIX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014

0.75

The correlation between TSIIX and JMSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSIIX vs. JMSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSIIX
TSIIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TSIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
TSIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

JMSIX
JMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
JMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Strategic Income Fund (TSIIX) and JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSIIXJMSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.57

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

3.43

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.46

14.19

-5.72

TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the JMSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSIIX and JMSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSIIX drawdown since its inception was -21.98%, which is greater than JMSIX's maximum drawdown of -18.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSIIX and JMSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSIIXJMSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.98%

-18.40%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.14%

-1.62%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.62%

-2.31%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.40%

-11.39%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.58%

-18.40%

+8.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.35%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-2.56%

+0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.62%

0.39%

+0.23%

Volatility

TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Volatility Comparison

Thornburg Strategic Income Fund (TSIIX) has a higher volatility of 0.84% compared to JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX) at 0.77%. This indicates that TSIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSIIXJMSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

0.77%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.08%

1.93%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79%

2.54%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.39%

3.73%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.96%

3.87%

-0.91%

TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSIIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JMSIX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Dividend Comparison

TSIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than JMSIX's 6.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JMSIX
JPMorgan Income Fund
6.04%5.95%5.78%4.43%4.78%4.00%4.95%5.10%5.43%5.42%0.46%0.00%
TSIIX
Thornburg Strategic Income Fund
4.88%4.99%5.10%4.50%3.49%4.17%3.70%3.82%3.40%3.59%3.43%4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSIIX and JMSIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSIIX has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to JMSIX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSIIX dropped -21.98% vs JMSIX's -18.40%.

JMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSIIX and JMSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer