TSIIX vs. JMSIX
TSIIX (Thornburg Strategic Income Fund) and JMSIX (JPMorgan Income Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, TSIIX returned 4.28%/yr vs 3.95%/yr for JMSIX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSIIX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for JMSIX.
Performance
TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSIIX achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than JMSIX's 1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, TSIIX has outperformed JMSIX with an annualized return of 4.28%, while JMSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.95% annualized return.
TSIIX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- 5.16%
- 3Y*
- 5.90%
- 5Y*
- 3.00%
- 10Y*
- 4.28%
JMSIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 2.84%
- 10Y*
- 3.95%
TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSIIX Thornburg Strategic Income Fund | 0.81% | 7.58% | 4.85% | 7.63% | -6.44% | 2.80% | 8.27% | 7.92% | 0.70% | 6.48% |
JMSIX JPMorgan Income Fund | 1.11% | 7.68% | 7.78% | 6.14% | -8.24% | 3.59% | 3.07% | 11.82% | 1.03% | 6.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSIIX and JMSIX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014 | 0.75 |
The correlation between TSIIX and JMSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSIIX vs. JMSIX — Risk / Return Rank
TSIIX
JMSIX
TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Strategic Income Fund (TSIIX) and JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSIIX | JMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.57 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 3.43 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.46 | 14.19 | -5.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSIIX drawdown since its inception was -21.98%, which is greater than JMSIX's maximum drawdown of -18.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSIIX and JMSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSIIX | JMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.98% | -18.40% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.14% | -1.62% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.62% | -2.31% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.40% | -11.39% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.58% | -18.40% | +8.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -0.35% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.64% | -2.56% | +0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.62% | 0.39% | +0.23% |
Volatility
TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Volatility Comparison
Thornburg Strategic Income Fund (TSIIX) has a higher volatility of 0.84% compared to JPMorgan Income Fund (JMSIX) at 0.77%. This indicates that TSIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSIIX | JMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 0.77% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.08% | 1.93% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79% | 2.54% | +0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.39% | 3.73% | -0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.96% | 3.87% | -0.91% |
TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSIIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JMSIX's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Dividend Comparison
TSIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than JMSIX's 6.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMSIX JPMorgan Income Fund | 6.04% | 5.95% | 5.78% | 4.43% | 4.78% | 4.00% | 4.95% | 5.10% | 5.43% | 5.42% | 0.46% | 0.00% |
TSIIX Thornburg Strategic Income Fund | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.10% | 4.50% | 3.49% | 4.17% | 3.70% | 3.82% | 3.40% | 3.59% | 3.43% | 4.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSIIX and JMSIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSIIX has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to JMSIX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSIIX dropped -21.98% vs JMSIX's -18.40%.
JMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSIIX and JMSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer