PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSIIX vs. JMSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Strategic Income Fund (TSIIX) and JPMorgan Income Fund Class I (JMSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSIIX achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than JMSIX's 1.12% return. Over the past 10 years, TSIIX has outperformed JMSIX with an annualized return of 4.05%, while JMSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.76% annualized return.


TSIIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.79%
6M
0.02%
YTD
0.35%
1Y
3.00%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
2.72%
10Y*
4.05%
ALL TIME*
5.81%

JMSIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.47%
6M
0.74%
YTD
1.12%
1Y
3.79%
3Y*
6.81%
5Y*
2.71%
10Y*
3.76%
ALL TIME*
2.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSIIX
Thornburg Strategic Income Fund
0.35%7.58%4.85%7.63%-6.44%2.80%8.27%7.92%0.70%6.48%
JMSIX
JPMorgan Income Fund Class I
1.12%7.68%7.78%6.14%-8.24%3.59%3.07%11.82%1.03%6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between TSIIX and JMSIX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014

0.75

The correlation between TSIIX and JMSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSIIX vs. JMSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSIIX
TSIIX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
TSIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
TSIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

JMSIX
JMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
JMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
JMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Strategic Income Fund (TSIIX) and JPMorgan Income Fund Class I (JMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSIIXJMSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.49

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

2.89

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.14

11.55

-5.41

TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the JMSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSIIX and JMSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSIIX drawdown since its inception was -21.98%, which is greater than JMSIX's maximum drawdown of -18.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSIIX and JMSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSIIXJMSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.98%

-18.40%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.14%

-1.62%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.56%

-2.25%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.40%

-11.39%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.58%

-18.40%

+8.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.59%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-2.54%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

0.41%

+0.24%

Volatility

TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Volatility Comparison

Thornburg Strategic Income Fund (TSIIX) has a higher volatility of 0.60% compared to JPMorgan Income Fund Class I (JMSIX) at 0.53%. This indicates that TSIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSIIXJMSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

0.53%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.12%

1.94%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71%

2.50%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.39%

3.73%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.96%

3.86%

-0.90%

TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSIIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JMSIX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSIIX vs. JMSIX - Dividend Comparison

TSIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, less than JMSIX's 5.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JMSIX
JPMorgan Income Fund Class I
5.54%5.95%5.78%4.43%4.78%4.00%4.95%5.10%5.43%5.42%0.46%0.00%
TSIIX
Thornburg Strategic Income Fund
4.51%4.99%5.10%4.50%3.49%4.17%3.70%3.82%3.40%3.59%3.43%4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSIIX and JMSIX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSIIX has higher volatility (0.60%) compared to JMSIX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSIIX dropped -21.98% vs JMSIX's -18.40%.

JMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSIIX and JMSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer