PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSII vs. WTIU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSII vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSII achieves a -35.03% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 104.80% return.


TSII

1D
1.37%
1M
-22.61%
6M
-32.70%
YTD
-35.03%
1Y
-2.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-8.22%

WTIU

1D
3.15%
1M
45.95%
6M
51.31%
YTD
104.80%
1Y
114.64%
3Y*
0.02%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-4.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.63M$1.31M$1.07M
$1.32M$870.89K$849.27K

TSII vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TSII
REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF
-35.03%39.41%
WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
104.80%6.10%

Correlation

The correlation between TSII and WTIU is -0.13, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSII vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSII
TSII Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
TSII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSII Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSII Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TSII Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSII Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

WTIU
WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSII vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSIIWTIUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.24

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.11

2.09

-2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.29

4.79

-5.08

TSII vs. WTIU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSII Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the WTIU Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSII and WTIU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSII vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSII drawdown since its inception was -44.14%, smaller than the maximum WTIU drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSII and WTIU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSIIWTIUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.14%

-75.73%

+31.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.14%

-48.11%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.63%

-27.41%

-13.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.52%

-39.21%

+27.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.75%

21.07%

-5.32%

Volatility

TSII vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison

REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) has a higher volatility of 24.75% compared to MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) at 21.18%. This indicates that TSII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTIU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSIIWTIUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.75%

21.18%

+3.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.69%

57.82%

-20.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.70%

69.90%

-22.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.45%

70.86%

-20.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.45%

70.86%

-20.41%

TSII vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSII vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison

TSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 109.28%, while WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
TSII
REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF
109.28%32.17%
WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSII and WTIU have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSII has higher volatility (24.75%) compared to WTIU (21.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSII dropped -44.14% vs WTIU's -75.73%.

On 1-year performance, WTIU leads with 114.64% vs -2.85% for TSII. On fees, WTIU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, WTIU has been the lower-risk option at 21.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WTIU has performed better with a 114.64% return vs -2.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WTIU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSII.

TSII has the higher dividend yield at 109.28%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.

Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSII and 0.95% for WTIU.

WTIU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSII and WTIU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer