TSII vs. QTJL
TSII (REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSII charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
TSII vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSII achieves a -6.73% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 7.17% return.
TSII
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 6.19%
- YTD
- -6.73%
- 6M
- -7.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTJL
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 7.17%
- 6M
- 8.13%
- 1Y
- 21.38%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSII vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSII REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF | -6.73% | 43.72% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 7.17% | 12.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSII and QTJL is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSII vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
TSII
QTJL
TSII vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSII | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.52 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
TSII vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSII drawdown since its inception was -29.03%, smaller than the maximum QTJL drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSII and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSII | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.03% | -33.40% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.76% | 0.00% | -14.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.31% | -7.94% | -1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.27% | — |
Volatility
TSII vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSII | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.04% | 10.02% | +36.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.04% | 20.43% | +25.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.04% | 20.43% | +25.61% |
TSII vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSII vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
TSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 70.30%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSII REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF | 70.30% | 32.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSII and QTJL have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSII.
TSII has the higher dividend yield at 70.30%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSII and 0.79% for QTJL.
Find the right allocation for TSII and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer