PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSII vs. HOOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSII vs. HOOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSII achieves a -20.44% return, which is significantly lower than HOOW's -19.14% return.


TSII

1D
-3.03%
1M
-10.42%
6M
-18.91%
YTD
-20.44%
1Y
11.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.64%

HOOW

1D
-0.90%
1M
-10.64%
6M
-15.25%
YTD
-19.14%
1Y
-20.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSII vs. HOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TSII
REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF
-20.44%50.99%
HOOW
Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF
-19.14%52.60%

Correlation

The correlation between TSII and HOOW is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSII vs. HOOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSII
TSII Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TSII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSII Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSII Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TSII Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSII Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOW
HOOW Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HOOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOW Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOW Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSII vs. HOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSIIHOOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.03

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

-0.31

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.79

-0.51

+1.31

TSII vs. HOOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSII Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is higher than the HOOW Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSII and HOOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSII vs. HOOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSII drawdown since its inception was -29.03%, smaller than the maximum HOOW drawdown of -65.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSII and HOOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSIIHOOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.03%

-65.74%

+36.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.03%

-65.74%

+36.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.30%

-45.08%

+17.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.67%

-30.60%

+19.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.99%

39.51%

-25.52%

Volatility

TSII vs. HOOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) is 17.40%, while Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) has a volatility of 23.03%. This indicates that TSII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSIIHOOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.40%

23.03%

-5.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.57%

64.14%

-31.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.41%

84.43%

-40.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.83%

83.98%

-36.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.83%

83.98%

-36.15%

TSII vs. HOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TSII and HOOW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

TSII vs. HOOW - Dividend Comparison

TSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.48%, less than HOOW's 148.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025
HOOW
Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF
148.30%67.92%
TSII
REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF
87.48%32.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSII and HOOW have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOW has higher volatility (23.03%) compared to TSII (17.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSII dropped -29.03% vs HOOW's -65.74%.

On 1-year performance, TSII leads with 11.08% vs -20.29% for HOOW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, TSII has been the lower-risk option at 17.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSII has performed better with a 11.08% return vs -20.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSII and HOOW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

HOOW has the higher dividend yield at 148.30%, compared with 87.48% for TSII.

They also come from different issuers: REX and Roundhill.

TSII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSII and HOOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer