TSII vs. HOOW
TSII (REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF) and HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSII returned 11.08% vs -20.29% for HOOW. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
TSII vs. HOOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSII achieves a -20.44% return, which is significantly lower than HOOW's -19.14% return.
TSII
- 1D
- -3.03%
- 1M
- -10.42%
- 6M
- -18.91%
- YTD
- -20.44%
- 1Y
- 11.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.64%
HOOW
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -10.64%
- 6M
- -15.25%
- YTD
- -19.14%
- 1Y
- -20.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.34%
TSII vs. HOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSII REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF | -20.44% | 50.99% |
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | -19.14% | 52.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSII and HOOW is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSII vs. HOOW — Risk / Return Rank
TSII
HOOW
TSII vs. HOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSII | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.03 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | -0.31 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.79 | -0.51 | +1.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSII vs. HOOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSII drawdown since its inception was -29.03%, smaller than the maximum HOOW drawdown of -65.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSII and HOOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSII | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.03% | -65.74% | +36.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.03% | -65.74% | +36.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.30% | -45.08% | +17.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.67% | -30.60% | +19.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.99% | 39.51% | -25.52% |
Volatility
TSII vs. HOOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) is 17.40%, while Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) has a volatility of 23.03%. This indicates that TSII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSII | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.40% | 23.03% | -5.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.57% | 64.14% | -31.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.41% | 84.43% | -40.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.83% | 83.98% | -36.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.83% | 83.98% | -36.15% |
TSII vs. HOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TSII and HOOW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
TSII vs. HOOW - Dividend Comparison
TSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.48%, less than HOOW's 148.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | 148.30% | 67.92% |
TSII REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF | 87.48% | 32.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSII and HOOW have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOOW has higher volatility (23.03%) compared to TSII (17.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSII dropped -29.03% vs HOOW's -65.74%.
On 1-year performance, TSII leads with 11.08% vs -20.29% for HOOW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, TSII has been the lower-risk option at 17.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSII has performed better with a 11.08% return vs -20.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSII and HOOW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
HOOW has the higher dividend yield at 148.30%, compared with 87.48% for TSII.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Roundhill.
TSII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSII and HOOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer