TSII vs. FLYU
TSII (REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF) and FLYU (MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds from REX. TSII is actively managed, while FLYU is passively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSII charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FLYU.
Performance
TSII vs. FLYU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSII achieves a -6.73% return, which is significantly higher than FLYU's -19.58% return.
TSII
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 6.19%
- YTD
- -6.73%
- 6M
- -7.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLYU
- 1D
- -4.72%
- 1M
- 9.41%
- YTD
- -19.58%
- 6M
- -10.34%
- 1Y
- 3.38%
- 3Y*
- 11.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSII vs. FLYU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSII REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF | -6.73% | 43.72% |
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs | -19.58% | 25.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSII and FLYU is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSII vs. FLYU — Risk / Return Rank
TSII
FLYU
TSII vs. FLYU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) and MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs (FLYU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSII | FLYU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.20 | +0.55 |
Drawdowns
TSII vs. FLYU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSII drawdown since its inception was -29.03%, smaller than the maximum FLYU drawdown of -69.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSII and FLYU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSII | FLYU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.03% | -69.00% | +39.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -69.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.76% | -36.21% | +21.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.31% | -26.46% | +17.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 24.44% | — |
Volatility
TSII vs. FLYU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSII | FLYU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 25.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 57.25% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.04% | 73.65% | -27.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.04% | 83.18% | -37.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.04% | 83.18% | -37.14% |
TSII vs. FLYU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FLYU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSII vs. FLYU - Dividend Comparison
TSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 70.30%, while FLYU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FLYU MicroSectors Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSII REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF | 70.30% | 32.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSII and FLYU have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLYU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLYU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSII.
TSII has the higher dividend yield at 70.30%, compared with 0.00% for FLYU.
Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSII and 0.95% for FLYU.
Find the right allocation for TSII and FLYU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer