PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSII vs. AMDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSII vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSII achieves a -20.44% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 98.50% return.


TSII

1D
-3.03%
1M
-10.42%
6M
-18.91%
YTD
-20.44%
1Y
11.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.64%

AMDY

1D
1.50%
1M
-4.16%
6M
91.31%
YTD
98.50%
1Y
162.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
50.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSII vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TSII
REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF
-20.44%39.41%
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
98.50%61.74%

Correlation

The correlation between TSII and AMDY is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSII vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSII
TSII Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TSII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSII Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSII Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TSII Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSII Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDY
AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSII vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSIIAMDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.44

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

5.91

-5.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.79

13.07

-12.27

TSII vs. AMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSII Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the AMDY Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSII and AMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSII vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSII drawdown since its inception was -29.03%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSII and AMDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSIIAMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.03%

-53.92%

+24.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.03%

-27.59%

-1.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.30%

-10.85%

-16.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.67%

-17.47%

+6.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.99%

12.46%

+1.53%

Volatility

TSII vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison

REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF (TSII) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) have volatilities of 17.40% and 16.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSIIAMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.40%

16.60%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.57%

45.43%

-12.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.41%

57.58%

-13.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.83%

47.17%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.83%

47.17%

+0.66%

TSII vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSII vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

TSII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.48%, more than AMDY's 73.41% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
73.41%80.68%109.98%6.68%
TSII
REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF
87.48%32.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSII and AMDY have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSII has higher volatility (17.40%) compared to AMDY (16.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSII dropped -29.03% vs AMDY's -53.92%.

On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 162.10% vs 11.08% for TSII. On fees, TSII is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, AMDY has been the lower-risk option at 16.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 162.10% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSII is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for AMDY.

TSII has the higher dividend yield at 87.48%, compared with 73.41% for AMDY.

TSII is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AMDY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: REX and YieldMax ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSII and 1.23% for AMDY.

AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSII and AMDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer