TSIC vs. MTUM
TSIC (Truth Social American Icons ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSIC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Truth Social - Yorkville American Icons Index, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSIC charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
TSIC vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSIC achieves a 4.35% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 26.71% return.
TSIC
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 4.56%
- YTD
- 4.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- -3.53%
- 1M
- -3.83%
- 6M
- 25.50%
- YTD
- 26.71%
- 1Y
- 33.17%
- 3Y*
- 31.16%
- 5Y*
- 14.01%
- 10Y*
- 16.61%
TSIC vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSIC Truth Social American Icons ETF | 4.35% | -0.48% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 26.71% | -1.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSIC and MTUM is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSIC vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
TSIC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MTUM
TSIC vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Truth Social American Icons ETF (TSIC) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSIC | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.01 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.15 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSIC vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSIC drawdown since its inception was -9.19%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSIC and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSIC | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.19% | -34.08% | +24.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.33% | -8.31% | +2.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -6.19% | +1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.11% | — |
Volatility
TSIC vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSIC | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.37% | 23.38% | -10.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.37% | 21.49% | -8.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.37% | 21.47% | -8.10% |
TSIC vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSIC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSIC vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
TSIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than MTUM's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.59% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
TSIC Truth Social American Icons ETF | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSIC and MTUM have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TSIC.
TSIC has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.59% for MTUM.
TSIC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. TSIC tracks Truth Social - Yorkville American Icons Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Truth Social Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TSIC and 0.15% for MTUM.
Find the right allocation for TSIC and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer