TSIC vs. BDGS

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

TSIC (Truth Social American Icons ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. TSIC is passively managed, while BDGS is actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSIC charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

TSIC vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Truth Social American Icons ETF (TSIC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSIC achieves a 4.35% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's 5.10% return.

TSIC

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: 4.14%
• 6M: 4.56%
• YTD: 4.35%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -0.51%
• 6M: 5.30%
• YTD: 5.10%
• 1Y: 11.10%
• 3Y*: 13.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSIC vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSIC Truth Social American Icons ETF	4.35%	-0.48%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	5.10%	-0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between TSIC and BDGS is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025	0.21

Return for Risk

TSIC vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSIC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 72
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 75
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSIC vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Truth Social American Icons ETF (TSIC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSIC	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.80	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.70	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.36	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.84	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.68	—

Drawdowns

TSIC vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSIC drawdown since its inception was -9.19%, roughly equal to the maximum BDGS drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSIC and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSIC	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.19%	-9.12%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.33%	-1.33%	-4.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.64%	-0.67%	-3.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.98%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TSIC	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.47%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.27%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.37%	6.36%	+7.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.37%	8.21%	+5.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.37%	8.21%	+5.16%

TSIC vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSIC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSIC vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

TSIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than BDGS's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.53%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%
TSIC Truth Social American Icons ETF	0.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSIC and BDGS in my portfolio?

TSIC and BDGS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TSIC or BDGS?

On fees, TSIC is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSIC or BDGS?

TSIC is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSIC or BDGS?

TSIC has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.53% for BDGS.

What is the main difference between TSIC and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: Truth Social Funds and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TSIC and 0.87% for BDGS.