PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSHFX vs. AMFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSHFX vs. AMFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Asset Allocation Short Horizon (TSHFX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSHFX achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly higher than AMFIX's 0.30% return.


TSHFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.94%
YTD
1.67%
6M
1.59%
1Y
6.63%
3Y*
6.00%
5Y*
1.84%
10Y*
3.01%

AMFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.04%
YTD
0.30%
6M
0.48%
1Y
2.53%
3Y*
3.31%
5Y*
0.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSHFX vs. AMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSHFX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Short Horizon
1.67%7.47%4.35%7.43%-12.32%2.59%8.42%9.74%-1.62%1.26%
AMFIX
AAMA Income Fund
0.30%3.74%3.48%3.84%-6.26%-1.37%2.24%2.47%0.89%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between TSHFX and AMFIX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2017

0.60

The correlation between TSHFX and AMFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSHFX vs. AMFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSHFX
TSHFX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
TSHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TSHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

AMFIX
AMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
AMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSHFX vs. AMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Asset Allocation Short Horizon (TSHFX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSHFXAMFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.51

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

3.43

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.21

11.54

-1.34

TSHFX vs. AMFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSHFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the AMFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSHFX and AMFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSHFXAMFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

2.43

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.35

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.56

-0.46

Drawdowns

TSHFX vs. AMFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSHFX drawdown since its inception was -23.90%, which is greater than AMFIX's maximum drawdown of -9.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSHFX and AMFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSHFXAMFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.90%

-9.35%

-14.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-0.74%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.88%

-0.88%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.84%

-8.91%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.39%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.95%

-2.03%

-2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

0.22%

+0.46%

Volatility

TSHFX vs. AMFIX - Volatility Comparison

Transamerica Asset Allocation Short Horizon (TSHFX) has a higher volatility of 1.26% compared to AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) at 0.41%. This indicates that TSHFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSHFXAMFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

0.41%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

0.83%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.42%

1.04%

+2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.74%

2.17%

+2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.13%

1.74%

+2.39%

TSHFX vs. AMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSHFX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFIX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSHFX vs. AMFIX - Dividend Comparison

TSHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, more than AMFIX's 2.21% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMFIX
AAMA Income Fund
2.21%2.08%2.44%1.70%0.83%0.57%0.83%1.24%1.24%0.40%
TSHFX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Short Horizon
4.03%4.22%13.42%3.48%4.84%5.63%4.22%2.95%3.30%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSHFX and AMFIX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSHFX has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to AMFIX (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSHFX dropped -23.90% vs AMFIX's -9.35%.

AMFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSHFX and AMFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer