TSGGX vs. TLLIX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund (TSGGX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX).
TSGGX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Dec 8, 2011. TLLIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009.
Performance
TSGGX vs. TLLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TSGGX vs. TLLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSGGX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund | -4.77% | 17.42% | 12.98% | 19.45% | -18.19% | 13.49% | 17.44% | 23.66% | -9.29% | 18.11% |
TLLIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund | -4.26% | 20.75% | 15.17% | 20.53% | -17.52% | 17.12% | 17.20% | 26.04% | -7.05% | 19.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSGGX achieves a -4.77% return, which is significantly lower than TLLIX's -4.26% return. Over the past 10 years, TSGGX has underperformed TLLIX with an annualized return of 8.87%, while TLLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.65% annualized return.
TSGGX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -8.08%
- YTD
- -4.77%
- 6M
- -2.25%
- 1Y
- 13.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.17%
- 10Y*
- 8.87%
TLLIX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -8.27%
- YTD
- -4.26%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- 1Y
- 16.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.53%
- 5Y*
- 8.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TSGGX vs. TLLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSGGX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TLLIX's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
TSGGX vs. TLLIX — Risk / Return Rank
TSGGX
TLLIX
TSGGX vs. TLLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund (TSGGX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSGGX | TLLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 1.08 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 1.58 | -0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.23 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 1.27 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.11 | 6.02 | -0.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSGGX | TLLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 1.08 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.57 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.69 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.68 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between TSGGX and TLLIX is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TSGGX vs. TLLIX - Dividend Comparison
TSGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, more than TLLIX's 3.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSGGX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund | 7.49% | 7.14% | 2.83% | 2.34% | 8.15% | 11.10% | 6.38% | 4.81% | 5.33% | 0.63% | 3.82% | 5.13% |
TLLIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund | 3.26% | 3.12% | 2.26% | 2.17% | 2.35% | 2.29% | 1.71% | 2.25% | 2.67% | 0.15% | 2.57% | 0.27% |
Drawdowns
TSGGX vs. TLLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSGGX drawdown since its inception was -29.75%, smaller than the maximum TLLIX drawdown of -31.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSGGX and TLLIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSGGX | TLLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.75% | -31.41% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.62% | -10.75% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.86% | -25.38% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.75% | -31.41% | +1.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.60% | -8.79% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -4.19% | -0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 2.38% | -0.10% |
Volatility
TSGGX vs. TLLIX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund (TSGGX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX) have volatilities of 4.45% and 4.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TSGGX | TLLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 4.68% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.98% | 8.51% | -0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.68% | 15.13% | -1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.14% | 14.37% | -1.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.14% | 15.46% | -1.32% |