TSGGX vs. NWQIX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund (TSGGX) and Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX).
TSGGX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Dec 8, 2011. NWQIX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Dec 8, 2009.
Performance
TSGGX vs. NWQIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TSGGX vs. NWQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSGGX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund | -4.77% | 17.42% | 12.98% | 19.45% | -18.19% | 13.49% | 17.44% | 23.66% | -9.29% | 18.11% |
NWQIX Nuveen Flexible Income Fund | -0.33% | 12.22% | 6.03% | 11.61% | -13.64% | 4.94% | 5.54% | 18.57% | -4.07% | 9.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSGGX achieves a -4.77% return, which is significantly lower than NWQIX's -0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, TSGGX has outperformed NWQIX with an annualized return of 8.87%, while NWQIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.38% annualized return.
TSGGX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -8.08%
- YTD
- -4.77%
- 6M
- -2.25%
- 1Y
- 13.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.17%
- 10Y*
- 8.87%
NWQIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- YTD
- -0.33%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- 10.77%
- 3Y*
- 9.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.81%
- 10Y*
- 5.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TSGGX vs. NWQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSGGX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NWQIX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TSGGX vs. NWQIX — Risk / Return Rank
TSGGX
NWQIX
TSGGX vs. NWQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund (TSGGX) and Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSGGX | NWQIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 2.58 | -1.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 3.49 | -2.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.56 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 2.91 | -1.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.11 | 11.90 | -6.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSGGX | NWQIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 2.58 | -1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.68 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.86 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.72 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between TSGGX and NWQIX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TSGGX vs. NWQIX - Dividend Comparison
TSGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, more than NWQIX's 5.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSGGX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund | 7.49% | 7.14% | 2.83% | 2.34% | 8.15% | 11.10% | 6.38% | 4.81% | 5.33% | 0.63% | 3.82% | 5.13% |
NWQIX Nuveen Flexible Income Fund | 5.75% | 6.52% | 5.20% | 7.84% | 7.02% | 4.39% | 4.82% | 5.71% | 6.23% | 5.67% | 5.52% | 5.70% |
Drawdowns
TSGGX vs. NWQIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSGGX drawdown since its inception was -29.75%, which is greater than NWQIX's maximum drawdown of -23.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSGGX and NWQIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSGGX | NWQIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.75% | -23.89% | -5.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.62% | -3.75% | -5.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.86% | -17.75% | -8.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.75% | -23.89% | -5.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.60% | -2.94% | -5.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -3.04% | -1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 0.92% | +1.36% |
Volatility
TSGGX vs. NWQIX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund (TSGGX) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to Nuveen Flexible Income Fund (NWQIX) at 1.50%. This indicates that TSGGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TSGGX | NWQIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 1.50% | +2.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.98% | 2.76% | +5.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.68% | 4.41% | +9.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.14% | 5.64% | +7.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.14% | 6.31% | +7.83% |