PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSGGX vs. FYMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSGGX vs. FYMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund (TSGGX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSGGX achieves a 7.10% return, which is significantly lower than FYMIX's 8.45% return.


TSGGX

1D
0.20%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
7.10%
6M
6.42%
1Y
17.51%
3Y*
15.61%
5Y*
7.34%
10Y*
10.49%

FYMIX

1D
0.31%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
8.45%
6M
7.70%
1Y
19.29%
3Y*
15.31%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSGGX vs. FYMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TSGGX
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund
7.10%17.42%12.98%19.45%-15.03%
FYMIX
Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund
8.45%18.95%11.09%16.15%-15.71%

Correlation

The correlation between TSGGX and FYMIX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022

0.97

The correlation between TSGGX and FYMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSGGX vs. FYMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSGGX
TSGGX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TSGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
TSGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FYMIX
FYMIX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FYMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FYMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSGGX vs. FYMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund (TSGGX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSGGXFYMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.33

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

2.30

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.29

9.78

-0.49

TSGGX vs. FYMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSGGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the FYMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSGGX and FYMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSGGX vs. FYMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSGGX drawdown since its inception was -29.75%, which is greater than FYMIX's maximum drawdown of -22.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSGGX and FYMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSGGXFYMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.75%

-22.70%

-7.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.60%

-8.80%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.88%

-12.72%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-1.53%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-5.57%

+1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

2.07%

-0.06%

Volatility

TSGGX vs. FYMIX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund (TSGGX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX) have volatilities of 4.58% and 4.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSGGXFYMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

4.78%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.40%

9.84%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.30%

11.52%

-0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.35%

12.82%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.18%

12.82%

+1.36%

TSGGX vs. FYMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSGGX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FYMIX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TSGGX vs. FYMIX - Dividend Comparison

TSGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, more than FYMIX's 3.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYMIX
Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund
3.40%3.69%1.84%1.78%1.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSGGX
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Growth Fund
6.66%7.14%2.83%2.34%8.15%11.10%6.38%4.81%5.33%0.63%3.82%5.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, TSGGX and FYMIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FYMIX has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to TSGGX (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSGGX dropped -29.75% vs FYMIX's -22.70%.

FYMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSGGX and FYMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer