PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSEP vs. UXJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSEP vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - September (TSEP) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSEP achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 10.27% return.


TSEP

1D
0.31%
1M
1.02%
6M
5.08%
YTD
9.32%
1Y
18.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.01%

UXJL

1D
0.93%
1M
0.21%
6M
8.78%
YTD
10.27%
1Y
21.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$78.97K$65.52K$84.25K
$17.25K$15.17K$23.14K

TSEP vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TSEP and UXJL is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2025

0.75

The correlation between TSEP and UXJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSEP vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSEP
TSEP Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

UXJL
UXJL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
UXJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UXJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
UXJL Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
UXJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
UXJL Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSEP vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - September (TSEP) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSEPUXJLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.24

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

1.92

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.04

7.73

+2.32

TSEP vs. UXJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the UXJL Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSEP and UXJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSEP vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSEP drawdown since its inception was -9.83%, roughly equal to the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSEP and UXJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSEPUXJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-10.29%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.25%

-10.29%

+3.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-2.10%

+1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.63%

-1.67%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

2.56%

-0.77%

Volatility

TSEP vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - September (TSEP) is 2.99%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that TSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UXJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSEPUXJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

3.98%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.57%

11.60%

-3.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.46%

14.65%

-4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.30%

14.47%

-3.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.30%

14.47%

-3.17%

TSEP vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSEP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSEP vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither TSEP nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TSEP and UXJL have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UXJL has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to TSEP (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSEP dropped -9.83% vs UXJL's -10.29%.

On 1-year performance, UXJL leads with 21.89% vs 18.62% for TSEP. On fees, UXJL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, TSEP has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UXJL has performed better with a 21.89% return vs 18.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UXJL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TSEP.

TSEP and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TSEP and 0.85% for UXJL.

TSEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSEP and UXJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer