PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSEGX vs. COBYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSEGX vs. COBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets Growth Fund (TSEGX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSEGX achieves a 24.39% return, which is significantly higher than COBYX's 10.74% return. Over the past 10 years, TSEGX has outperformed COBYX with an annualized return of 8.81%, while COBYX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.79% annualized return.


TSEGX

1D
1.09%
1M
9.90%
YTD
24.39%
6M
24.90%
1Y
34.08%
3Y*
16.54%
5Y*
-0.23%
10Y*
8.81%

COBYX

1D
0.67%
1M
4.17%
YTD
10.74%
6M
13.67%
1Y
14.46%
3Y*
8.98%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*
4.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSEGX vs. COBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSEGX
Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets Growth Fund
24.39%20.40%2.76%11.01%-34.75%-10.02%52.33%27.56%-13.28%38.48%
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
10.74%20.50%-10.32%16.73%9.28%9.05%-10.97%9.40%-13.40%15.12%

Correlation

The correlation between TSEGX and COBYX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2014

0.46

The correlation between TSEGX and COBYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSEGX vs. COBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSEGX
TSEGX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
TSEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TSEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

COBYX
COBYX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
COBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
COBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
COBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
COBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSEGX vs. COBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets Growth Fund (TSEGX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSEGXCOBYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.78

1.23

+0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.45

1.86

+0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.22

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

1.62

+0.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.78

5.15

+4.63

TSEGX vs. COBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSEGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the COBYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSEGX and COBYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSEGXCOBYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

1.23

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.59

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.35

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.39

-0.04

Drawdowns

TSEGX vs. COBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSEGX drawdown since its inception was -52.81%, which is greater than COBYX's maximum drawdown of -34.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSEGX and COBYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSEGXCOBYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.81%

-34.18%

-18.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.30%

-8.95%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.48%

-16.29%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.50%

-17.10%

-33.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.81%

-34.18%

-18.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.36%

-1.12%

-11.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.61%

-6.80%

-12.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

2.99%

+0.51%

Volatility

TSEGX vs. COBYX - Volatility Comparison

Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets Growth Fund (TSEGX) has a higher volatility of 8.47% compared to The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) at 3.75%. This indicates that TSEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSEGXCOBYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.47%

3.75%

+4.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.57%

9.46%

+7.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.30%

11.78%

+7.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.37%

13.99%

+6.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.32%

13.64%

+6.68%

TSEGX vs. COBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSEGX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is lower than COBYX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSEGX vs. COBYX - Dividend Comparison

TSEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than COBYX's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
1.06%1.18%0.00%1.01%1.16%2.18%0.32%0.69%12.60%1.88%5.09%
TSEGX
Touchstone Sands Capital Emerging Markets Growth Fund
0.76%0.94%0.18%0.00%0.00%1.96%0.00%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSEGX and COBYX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSEGX has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to COBYX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSEGX dropped -52.81% vs COBYX's -34.18%.

TSEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSEGX and COBYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer