TSDD vs. SH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) and SH (ProShares Short S&P500) are both Inverse Equities funds. TSDD is actively managed, while SH is passively managed. Over the past year, TSDD returned -62.89% vs -17.23% for SH. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSDD charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SH.

Performance

TSDD vs. SH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSDD achieves a -4.27% return, which is significantly higher than SH's -8.00% return.

TSDD

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -17.41%
• YTD: -4.27%
• 6M: -7.92%
• 1Y: -62.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SH

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -4.35%
• YTD: -8.00%
• 6M: -7.59%
• 1Y: -17.23%
• 3Y*: -13.02%
• 5Y*: -9.07%
• 10Y*: -12.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSDD vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF	-4.27%	-74.84%	-89.21%	-20.49%
SH ProShares Short S&P500	-8.00%	-11.35%	-13.52%	-5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TSDD and SH is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023	0.55

The correlation between TSDD and SH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

TSDD vs. SH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TSDD	SH
Consumer Cyclical	200.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	91.6%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TSDD vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSDD

TSDD Risk / Return Rank: 3
TSDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
TSDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
TSDD Omega Ratio Rank: 3
TSDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
TSDD Martin Ratio Rank: 4

SH

SH Risk / Return Rank: 1
SH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
SH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
SH Omega Ratio Rank: 1
SH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
SH Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSDD vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSDD	SH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.68	-1.47	+0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.87	-2.10	+1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	0.77	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	-0.95	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.05	-1.75	+0.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSDD vs. SH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSDD Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is higher than the SH Sharpe Ratio of -1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSDD and SH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSDD	SH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.68	-1.47	+0.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.66	-0.59	-0.07

Drawdowns

TSDD vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSDD drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, roughly equal to the maximum SH drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSDD and SH.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSDD	SH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.03%	-94.66%	-4.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-76.12%	-18.28%	-57.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-38.82%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.53%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-76.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.90%	-94.62%	-4.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-71.21%	-67.73%	-3.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	59.88%	9.89%	+49.99%

Volatility

TSDD vs. SH - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a higher volatility of 24.19% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 2.84%. This indicates that TSDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSDD	SH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.19%	2.84%	+21.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.90%	8.91%	+45.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.57%	11.80%	+80.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	114.46%	16.85%	+97.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	114.46%	18.01%	+96.45%

TSDD vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSDD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SH's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSDD vs. SH - Dividend Comparison

TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, more than SH's 4.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SH ProShares Short S&P500	4.51%	4.49%	6.20%	5.37%	1.08%	0.00%	0.16%	1.76%	1.01%	0.06%
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF	8.80%	8.42%	0.00%	24.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSDD and SH in my portfolio?

TSDD and SH have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSDD or SH?

TSDD has higher volatility (24.19%) compared to SH (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSDD dropped -99.03% vs SH's -94.66%.

Which ETF is better, TSDD or SH?

On 1-year performance, SH leads with -17.23% vs -62.89% for TSDD. On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSDD or SH?

Over the 1-year period, SH has performed better with a -17.23% return vs -62.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSDD or SH?

SH is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSDD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSDD or SH?

TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 8.80%, compared with 4.51% for SH.

What is the main difference between TSDD and SH?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSDD and 0.90% for SH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.68 vs -1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.