TSDD vs. CRCD

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) and CRCD (T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CRCD.

Performance

TSDD vs. CRCD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSDD achieves a -2.07% return, which is significantly higher than CRCD's -80.88% return.

TSDD

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: -2.57%
• 6M: -2.07%
• YTD: -2.07%
• 1Y: -62.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRCD

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 25.38%
• 6M: -78.18%
• YTD: -80.88%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSDD vs. CRCD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF	-2.07%	-23.90%
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF	-80.88%	38.83%

Correlation

The correlation between TSDD and CRCD is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025	0.33

Return for Risk

TSDD vs. CRCD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSDD

TSDD Risk / Return Rank: 3
TSDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
TSDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
TSDD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
TSDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
TSDD Martin Ratio Rank: 4

CRCD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSDD vs. CRCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSDD	CRCD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.70	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.90	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.90	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.15	—	—

Drawdowns

TSDD vs. CRCD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSDD drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, roughly equal to the maximum CRCD drawdown of -96.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSDD and CRCD.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSDD	CRCD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.03%	-96.95%	-2.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.88%	-90.93%	-7.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-72.14%	-59.69%	-12.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	54.77%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TSDD	CRCD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	34.42%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	62.90%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	89.44%	200.82%	-111.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	114.59%	200.82%	-86.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	114.59%	200.82%	-86.23%

TSDD vs. CRCD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CRCD's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSDD vs. CRCD - Dividend Comparison

TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.60%, while CRCD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF	8.60%	8.42%	0.00%	24.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSDD and CRCD in my portfolio?

TSDD and CRCD have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TSDD or CRCD?

On fees, TSDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSDD or CRCD?

TSDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRCD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSDD or CRCD?

TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 8.60%, compared with 0.00% for CRCD.

What is the main difference between TSDD and CRCD?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TSDD and 1.50% for CRCD.