PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSDD vs. BAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSDD vs. BAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSDD achieves a -4.27% return, which is significantly lower than BAR's 2.94% return.


TSDD

1D
0.14%
1M
-17.41%
YTD
-4.27%
6M
-7.92%
1Y
-62.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAR

1D
-1.02%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
2.94%
6M
5.50%
1Y
32.26%
3Y*
31.38%
5Y*
18.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSDD vs. BAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF
-4.27%-74.84%-89.21%-20.49%
BAR
GraniteShares Gold Trust
2.94%64.12%26.97%8.60%

Correlation

The correlation between TSDD and BAR is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSDD vs. BAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSDD
TSDD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
TSDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSDD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TSDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSDD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

BAR
BAR Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAR Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAR Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSDD vs. BAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSDDBARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.25

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

1.69

-2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.05

4.19

-5.24

TSDD vs. BAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSDD Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the BAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSDD and BAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSDDBARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.68

1.23

-1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.66

0.90

-1.56

Drawdowns

TSDD vs. BAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSDD drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, which is greater than BAR's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSDD and BAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSDDBARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.03%

-21.53%

-77.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.12%

-19.19%

-56.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.90%

-17.72%

-81.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.21%

-6.45%

-64.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

59.88%

7.72%

+52.16%

Volatility

TSDD vs. BAR - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a higher volatility of 24.19% compared to GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) at 5.46%. This indicates that TSDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSDDBARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.19%

5.46%

+18.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.90%

23.03%

+31.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.57%

26.43%

+66.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

114.46%

17.90%

+96.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

114.46%

16.38%

+98.08%

TSDD vs. BAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSDD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BAR's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSDD vs. BAR - Dividend Comparison

TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, while BAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
BAR
GraniteShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF
8.80%8.42%0.00%24.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSDD and BAR have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSDD has higher volatility (24.19%) compared to BAR (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSDD dropped -99.03% vs BAR's -21.53%.

On 1-year performance, BAR leads with 32.26% vs -62.89% for TSDD. On fees, BAR is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, BAR has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BAR has performed better with a 32.26% return vs -62.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BAR is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSDD.

TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 8.80%, compared with 0.00% for BAR.

TSDD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while BAR is Gold. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSDD and 0.17% for BAR.

BAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSDD and BAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer