TSCV vs. SMIG
TSCV (Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF) and SMIG (Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
TSCV vs. SMIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSCV achieves a 20.01% return, which is significantly higher than SMIG's 12.95% return.
TSCV
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 20.01%
- 6M
- 18.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMIG
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- YTD
- 12.95%
- 6M
- 11.75%
- 1Y
- 14.54%
- 3Y*
- 13.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSCV vs. SMIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF | 20.01% | 6.24% |
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | 12.95% | 1.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCV and SMIG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSCV vs. SMIG — Risk / Return Rank
TSCV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMIG
TSCV vs. SMIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV) and Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSCV | SMIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.71 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.45 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSCV vs. SMIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCV drawdown since its inception was -10.17%, smaller than the maximum SMIG drawdown of -19.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCV and SMIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCV | SMIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.17% | -19.65% | +9.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -0.15% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.95% | -6.48% | +4.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.27% | — |
Volatility
TSCV vs. SMIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSCV | SMIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.72% | 12.05% | +4.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 16.16% | +0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 16.16% | +0.56% |
TSCV vs. SMIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TSCV and SMIG have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
TSCV vs. SMIG - Dividend Comparison
TSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than SMIG's 1.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIG Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF | 1.71% | 1.82% | 1.75% | 1.91% | 2.00% | 0.50% |
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF | 0.24% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSCV and SMIG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSCV and SMIG have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
SMIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.24% for TSCV.
They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and Bahl & Gaynor.
Find the right allocation for TSCV and SMIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer