TSCV vs. IBTF
TSCV (Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF) and IBTF (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSCV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Thrivent, while IBTF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2025 Maturity US Treasury Index. TSCV is actively managed, while IBTF is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. TSCV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTF.
Performance
TSCV vs. IBTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TSCV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 5.29%
- YTD
- 21.01%
- 6M
- 19.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 1.92%
- 3Y*
- 3.74%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- —
TSCV vs. IBTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF | 21.01% | 6.24% |
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF | 0.00% | 0.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCV and IBTF is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSCV vs. IBTF — Risk / Return Rank
TSCV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBTF
TSCV vs. IBTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSCV | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 6.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 53.32 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 269.65 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSCV vs. IBTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCV drawdown since its inception was -10.17%, roughly equal to the maximum IBTF drawdown of -10.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCV and IBTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCV | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.17% | -10.45% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.95% | -3.30% | +1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.01% | — |
Volatility
TSCV vs. IBTF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSCV | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.73% | 0.34% | +16.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 2.37% | +14.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 2.55% | +14.18% |
TSCV vs. IBTF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSCV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTF's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSCV vs. IBTF - Dividend Comparison
TSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than IBTF's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF | 2.08% | 3.83% | 4.32% | 4.03% | 1.93% | 0.57% | 0.59% |
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF | 0.23% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSCV and IBTF have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTF is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTF is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TSCV.
IBTF has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.23% for TSCV.
TSCV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while IBTF is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TSCV and 0.07% for IBTF.
Find the right allocation for TSCV and IBTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer