TSCSX vs. TQSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) and T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (TQSIX).
TSCSX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jul 1, 1996. TQSIX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Feb 26, 2016.
Performance
TSCSX vs. TQSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TSCSX vs. TQSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSCSX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S | -3.28% | 2.36% | 12.73% | 12.47% | -10.94% | 24.22% | 22.87% | 27.92% | -10.52% | 21.22% |
TQSIX T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund | -2.09% | 12.94% | 16.54% | 21.99% | -12.97% | 22.12% | 11.92% | 30.43% | -10.78% | 15.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSCSX achieves a -3.28% return, which is significantly lower than TQSIX's -2.09% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TSCSX having a 11.51% annualized return and TQSIX not far behind at 11.39%.
TSCSX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -9.54%
- YTD
- -3.28%
- 6M
- -1.94%
- 1Y
- 10.06%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- 4.01%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
TQSIX
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -9.20%
- YTD
- -2.09%
- 6M
- -0.11%
- 1Y
- 16.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.84%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TSCSX vs. TQSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSCSX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than TQSIX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TSCSX vs. TQSIX — Risk / Return Rank
TSCSX
TQSIX
TSCSX vs. TQSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) and T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (TQSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSCSX | TQSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.46 | 0.80 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.81 | 1.25 | -0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.17 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 1.04 | -0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.01 | 4.44 | -2.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSCSX | TQSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 0.80 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.46 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.56 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.60 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCSX and TQSIX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TSCSX vs. TQSIX - Dividend Comparison
TSCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than TQSIX's 1.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSCSX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S | 2.44% | 2.36% | 3.18% | 0.46% | 9.60% | 11.33% | 1.60% | 8.72% | 15.00% | 6.68% | 4.19% | 8.34% |
TQSIX T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund | 1.35% | 1.32% | 6.61% | 3.55% | 6.35% | 1.58% | 0.81% | 1.24% | 2.28% | 0.42% | 0.88% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TSCSX vs. TQSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCSX drawdown since its inception was -56.66%, which is greater than TQSIX's maximum drawdown of -40.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCSX and TQSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCSX | TQSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.66% | -40.65% | -16.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.31% | -14.06% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.04% | -23.76% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.63% | -40.65% | -0.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.36% | -10.41% | -0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -5.17% | -5.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 3.29% | +0.67% |
Volatility
TSCSX vs. TQSIX - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) and T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (TQSIX) have volatilities of 6.31% and 6.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TSCSX | TQSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.31% | 6.46% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | 11.91% | +0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.16% | 20.88% | +1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 19.37% | +2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 20.23% | +1.85% |