TQSIX vs. FCAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (TQSIX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX).
TQSIX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Feb 26, 2016. FCAGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 2004.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TQSIX or FCAGX.
Key characteristics
| TQSIX | FCAGX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 25.13% | 30.75% |
| 1Y Return | 45.22% | 54.39% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.64% | 0.54% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 13.73% | 6.67% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.75 | 2.85 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.80 | 3.74 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.49 | 1.47 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.77 | 1.36 |
| Martin Ratio | 18.13 | 17.33 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.59% | 3.26% |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.08% | 19.78% |
| Max Drawdown | -40.65% | -59.24% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -9.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between TQSIX and FCAGX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
TQSIX vs. FCAGX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, TQSIX achieves a 25.13% return, which is significantly lower than FCAGX's 30.75% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TQSIX vs. FCAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TQSIX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than FCAGX's 1.29% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TQSIX vs. FCAGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (TQSIX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TQSIX vs. FCAGX - Dividend Comparison
TQSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than FCAGX's 0.66% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQSIX T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund | 0.57% | 0.71% | 0.79% | 0.47% | 0.34% | 0.50% | 0.64% | 0.49% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCAGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.32% | 8.61% | 17.23% |
Drawdowns
TQSIX vs. FCAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TQSIX drawdown since its inception was -40.65%, smaller than the maximum FCAGX drawdown of -59.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQSIX and FCAGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TQSIX vs. FCAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (TQSIX) is 5.23%, while Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) has a volatility of 5.70%. This indicates that TQSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.