TQSIX vs. LGILX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (TQSIX) and Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund (LGILX).
TQSIX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Feb 26, 2016. LGILX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Oct 14, 1997.
Performance
TQSIX vs. LGILX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TQSIX vs. LGILX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQSIX T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund | 1.34% | 12.94% | 16.54% | 21.99% | -12.97% | 22.12% | 11.92% | 30.43% | -10.78% | 15.52% |
LGILX Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund | -8.44% | -0.54% | 31.98% | 48.08% | -38.11% | 20.06% | 38.40% | 32.59% | 2.00% | 33.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TQSIX achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly higher than LGILX's -8.44% return. Over the past 10 years, TQSIX has underperformed LGILX with an annualized return of 11.77%, while LGILX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.28% annualized return.
TQSIX
- 1D
- 3.51%
- 1M
- -6.56%
- YTD
- 1.34%
- 6M
- 3.43%
- 1Y
- 20.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.17%
- 5Y*
- 9.20%
- 10Y*
- 11.77%
LGILX
- 1D
- 3.82%
- 1M
- -5.25%
- YTD
- -8.44%
- 6M
- -19.88%
- 1Y
- 0.21%
- 3Y*
- 14.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.30%
- 10Y*
- 13.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TQSIX vs. LGILX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TQSIX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than LGILX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TQSIX vs. LGILX — Risk / Return Rank
TQSIX
LGILX
TQSIX vs. LGILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (TQSIX) and Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund (LGILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TQSIX | LGILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 0.04 | +0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 0.23 | +1.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.04 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | -0.08 | +1.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.26 | -0.21 | +6.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TQSIX | LGILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.04 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.20 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.55 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.32 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between TQSIX and LGILX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TQSIX vs. LGILX - Dividend Comparison
TQSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, while LGILX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQSIX T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund | 1.30% | 1.32% | 6.61% | 3.55% | 6.35% | 1.58% | 0.81% | 1.24% | 2.28% | 0.42% | 0.88% |
LGILX Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.95% | 18.16% | 13.58% | 13.58% | 5.22% | 8.46% | 8.42% | 13.64% | 1.65% |
Drawdowns
TQSIX vs. LGILX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TQSIX drawdown since its inception was -40.65%, smaller than the maximum LGILX drawdown of -67.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQSIX and LGILX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TQSIX | LGILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.65% | -67.74% | +27.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.06% | -26.18% | +12.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.76% | -43.00% | +19.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.65% | -43.00% | +2.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.27% | -23.36% | +16.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.17% | -21.31% | +16.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 10.18% | -6.86% |
Volatility
TQSIX vs. LGILX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (TQSIX) has a higher volatility of 7.50% compared to Schwab Select Large Cap Growth Fund (LGILX) at 6.98%. This indicates that TQSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TQSIX | LGILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.50% | 6.98% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.40% | 19.85% | -7.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.12% | 26.60% | -5.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.44% | 26.28% | -6.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 24.07% | -3.81% |