PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSCSX vs. AAAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSCSX vs. AAAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) and Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSCSX achieves a 12.98% return, which is significantly higher than AAAGX's 6.31% return. Over the past 10 years, TSCSX has underperformed AAAGX with an annualized return of 12.62%, while AAAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.25% annualized return.


TSCSX

1D
1.22%
1M
4.74%
YTD
12.98%
6M
11.77%
1Y
24.87%
3Y*
13.11%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
12.62%

AAAGX

1D
-0.14%
1M
5.06%
YTD
6.31%
6M
5.62%
1Y
23.58%
3Y*
26.36%
5Y*
13.92%
10Y*
17.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSCSX vs. AAAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSCSX
Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S
12.98%2.36%12.73%12.47%-10.94%24.22%22.87%27.92%-10.52%21.22%
AAAGX
Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund
6.31%16.12%39.55%46.09%-34.10%22.05%42.49%31.64%1.43%24.42%

Correlation

The correlation between TSCSX and AAAGX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 1999

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between TSCSX and AAAGX has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSCSX vs. AAAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSCSX
TSCSX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TSCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
TSCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

AAAGX
AAAGX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
AAAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSCSX vs. AAAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) and Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSCSXAAAGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.57

1.53

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.31

2.11

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.27

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

1.45

+0.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.85

4.86

+2.99

TSCSX vs. AAAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSCSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the AAAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSCSX and AAAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSCSXAAAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

1.53

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.62

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.80

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.34

+0.08

Drawdowns

TSCSX vs. AAAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSCSX drawdown since its inception was -56.66%, smaller than the maximum AAAGX drawdown of -64.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCSX and AAAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSCSXAAAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.66%

-64.98%

+8.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.53%

-16.76%

+5.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.84%

-23.44%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.04%

-40.41%

+13.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.63%

-40.41%

-1.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.14%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.25%

-23.87%

+13.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

5.01%

-1.58%

Volatility

TSCSX vs. AAAGX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) at 3.80%. This indicates that TSCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSCSXAAAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

3.80%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.33%

12.18%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.20%

15.98%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.66%

22.74%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.13%

21.71%

+0.42%

TSCSX vs. AAAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSCSX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAGX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSCSX vs. AAAGX - Dividend Comparison

TSCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than AAAGX's 3.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAAGX
Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund
3.54%3.77%14.46%3.55%9.38%6.93%7.74%5.39%12.26%0.00%0.60%0.00%
TSCSX
Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S
2.09%2.36%3.18%0.46%9.60%11.33%1.60%8.72%15.00%6.68%4.19%8.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSCSX and AAAGX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSCSX has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to AAAGX (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSCSX dropped -56.66% vs AAAGX's -64.98%.

TSCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSCSX and AAAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer