PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSCO vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TSCO vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSCO achieves a -39.23% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 16.16% return. Over the past 10 years, TSCO has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 6.34%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 30.33% annualized return.


TSCO

1D
-5.57%
1M
-10.57%
YTD
-39.23%
6M
-42.90%
1Y
-35.99%
3Y*
-9.09%
5Y*
-1.63%
10Y*
6.34%

AAPL

1D
2.90%
1M
12.62%
YTD
16.16%
6M
10.34%
1Y
56.89%
3Y*
20.88%
5Y*
21.22%
10Y*
30.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSCO vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSCO
Tractor Supply Company
-39.23%-4.16%25.43%-2.55%-3.97%71.57%52.33%13.53%13.34%0.32%
AAPL
Apple Inc
16.16%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Correlation

The correlation between TSCO and AAPL is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 1994

0.23

The correlation between TSCO and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

TSCO:

$2.06

AAPL:

$8.24

PE Ratio

TSCO:

14.56

AAPL:

38.27

PEG Ratio

TSCO:

3.18

AAPL:

5.04

PS Ratio

TSCO:

1.03

AAPL:

10.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

TSCO:

$15.52B

AAPL:

$451.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TSCO:

$5.16B

AAPL:

$216.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

TSCO:

$1.96B

AAPL:

$153.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSCO vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSCO
TSCO Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
TSCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSCO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TSCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSCO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSCO vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSCOAAPLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.17

2.57

-3.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.61

3.56

-5.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.46

-0.66

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

4.17

-4.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.74

10.52

-12.26

TSCO vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSCO Sharpe Ratio is -1.17, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSCO and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSCOAAPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.17

2.57

-3.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

0.78

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

1.05

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.44

-0.02

Drawdowns

TSCO vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSCO drawdown since its inception was -76.15%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCO and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSCOAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.15%

-81.80%

+5.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.01%

-13.80%

-38.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.01%

-33.36%

-18.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.01%

-33.36%

-18.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.01%

-38.52%

-13.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.28%

0.00%

-51.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.43%

-29.61%

+12.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.13%

5.47%

+15.66%

Volatility

TSCO vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) has a higher volatility of 12.81% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.32%. This indicates that TSCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSCOAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.81%

5.32%

+7.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.43%

15.89%

+10.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.93%

22.25%

+8.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.83%

27.46%

+1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.39%

28.89%

+0.50%

Dividends

TSCO vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

TSCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than AAPL's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.33%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
TSCO
Tractor Supply Company
3.13%1.84%1.66%1.92%1.64%0.87%1.07%1.46%1.44%1.40%1.21%0.89%

Financials

TSCO vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tractor Supply Company and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B20222023202420252026
3.90B
111.18B
(TSCO) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TSCO vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tractor Supply Company and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
25.6%
49.3%
Portfolio components
TSCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tractor Supply Company reported a gross profit of 997.97M and revenue of 3.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.6%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

TSCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tractor Supply Company reported an operating income of 297.73M and revenue of 3.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

TSCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tractor Supply Company reported a net income of 227.41M and revenue of 3.90B, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TSCO and AAPL have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSCO has higher volatility (12.81%) compared to AAPL (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSCO dropped -76.15% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSCO and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer