PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSCO.L vs. RYCEY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TSCO.L vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Tesco PLC (TSCO.L) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TSCO.L is traded in GBp, while RYCEY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RYCEY values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSCO.L achieves a 9.36% return, which is significantly lower than RYCEY's 13.00% return. Over the past 10 years, TSCO.L has outperformed RYCEY with an annualized return of 15.99%, while RYCEY has yielded a comparatively lower 9.04% annualized return.


TSCO.L

1D
0.87%
1M
4.53%
YTD
9.36%
6M
9.61%
1Y
24.71%
3Y*
26.28%
5Y*
19.99%
10Y*
15.99%

RYCEY

1D
1.88%
1M
8.51%
YTD
13.00%
6M
19.36%
1Y
48.37%
3Y*
108.74%
5Y*
63.14%
10Y*
9.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSCO.L vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSCO.L
Tesco PLC
9.36%24.45%31.78%34.79%-18.79%30.32%-5.37%38.15%-7.70%1.70%
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
13.00%107.71%91.50%235.61%-26.10%3.50%-82.58%-16.01%-1.85%28.53%

Correlation

The correlation between TSCO.L and RYCEY is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2014

0.18

The correlation between TSCO.L and RYCEY shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TSCO.L:

£30.04B

RYCEY:

$147.86B

EPS

TSCO.L:

£0.54

RYCEY:

£0.99

PE Ratio

TSCO.L:

8.80

RYCEY:

13.26

PEG Ratio

TSCO.L:

0.48

RYCEY:

0.03

PS Ratio

TSCO.L:

0.21

RYCEY:

2.77

PB Ratio

TSCO.L:

2.62

RYCEY:

40.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

TSCO.L:

£143.63B

RYCEY:

£40.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TSCO.L:

£10.94B

RYCEY:

£10.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

TSCO.L:

£8.93B

RYCEY:

£8.04B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSCO.L vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSCO.L
TSCO.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
TSCO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSCO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSCO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
TSCO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSCO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

RYCEY
RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSCO.L vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tesco PLC (TSCO.L) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSCO.LRYCEYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.25

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

2.40

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.60

6.49

-1.88

TSCO.L vs. RYCEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSCO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the RYCEY Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSCO.L and RYCEY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSCO.L vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSCO.L drawdown since its inception was -63.40%, smaller than the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -98.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCO.L and RYCEY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSCO.LRYCEYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.40%

-98.54%

+35.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-20.27%

+7.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.76%

-22.51%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.40%

-52.69%

+20.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.40%

-93.60%

+61.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.60%

-71.63%

+68.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.62%

-81.06%

+57.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.36%

7.48%

-2.12%

Volatility

TSCO.L vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tesco PLC (TSCO.L) is 7.05%, while Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) has a volatility of 11.11%. This indicates that TSCO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSCO.LRYCEYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.05%

11.11%

-4.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.16%

30.96%

-13.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.55%

36.06%

-14.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.28%

41.78%

-21.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.53%

47.93%

-25.40%

Dividends

TSCO.L vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison

TSCO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than RYCEY's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
0.72%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.51%1.56%1.32%1.55%4.19%14.44%
TSCO.L
Tesco PLC
3.07%3.23%3.39%3.75%5.15%20.72%4.19%2.64%1.93%0.48%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TSCO.L vs. RYCEY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tesco PLC and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
37.68B
11.64B
(TSCO.L) Total Revenue
(RYCEY) Total Revenue
Values in GBP except per share items

TSCO.L vs. RYCEY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tesco PLC and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
7.3%
27.4%
Portfolio components
TSCO.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesco PLC reported a gross profit of 2.76B and revenue of 37.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.3%.

RYCEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

TSCO.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesco PLC reported an operating income of 1.49B and revenue of 37.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.

RYCEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

TSCO.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesco PLC reported a net income of 837.00M and revenue of 37.68B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.

RYCEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TSCO.L and RYCEY have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSCO.L and RYCEY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer