PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSCM vs. FEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSCM vs. FEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TSCM

1D
-0.92%
1M
5.27%
YTD
3.31%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FEMG

1D
-0.84%
1M
3.74%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSCM vs. FEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TSCM and FEMG is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2026

0.76

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSCM vs. FEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TSCM vs. FEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSCMFEMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

4.78

-4.51

Drawdowns

TSCM vs. FEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSCM drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, which is greater than FEMG's maximum drawdown of -3.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCM and FEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSCMFEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.87%

-3.29%

-11.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-1.18%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.33%

-0.96%

-5.37%

Volatility

TSCM vs. FEMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSCMFEMGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.03%

12.29%

+8.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.03%

12.29%

+8.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.03%

12.29%

+8.74%

TSCM vs. FEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSCM has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FEMG's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSCM vs. FEMG - Dividend Comparison

Neither TSCM nor FEMG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TSCM and FEMG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FEMG is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FEMG is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TSCM.

TSCM and FEMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: TimesSquare Capital Management and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TSCM and 0.23% for FEMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSCM and FEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer