TSCIX vs. YACKX
TSCIX (AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund) and YACKX (AMG Yacktman Fund) are both mutual funds - TSCIX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AMG, while YACKX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by AMG. Over the past 10 years, TSCIX returned 10.05%/yr vs 12.24%/yr for YACKX. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TSCIX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for YACKX.
Performance
TSCIX vs. YACKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSCIX achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly lower than YACKX's 17.47% return. Over the past 10 years, TSCIX has underperformed YACKX with an annualized return of 10.05%, while YACKX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.24% annualized return.
TSCIX
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- 6M
- 6.03%
- YTD
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 10.17%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 1.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.69%
YACKX
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- 6M
- 8.92%
- YTD
- 17.47%
- 1Y
- 31.05%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 10.58%
- 10Y*
- 12.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.82%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
TSCIX vs. YACKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSCIX AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund | 9.17% | 0.84% | 8.50% | 16.73% | -26.42% | 7.34% | 35.36% | 44.90% | -4.05% | 21.17% |
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 17.47% | 19.64% | 4.83% | 15.46% | -7.50% | 19.66% | 15.25% | 17.71% | 2.79% | 18.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCIX and YACKX is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2000 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TSCIX and YACKX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSCIX vs. YACKX — Risk / Return Rank
TSCIX
YACKX
TSCIX vs. YACKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCIX) and AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSCIX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.46 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 4.15 | -3.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.31 | 11.43 | -10.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSCIX vs. YACKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCIX drawdown since its inception was -49.74%, which is greater than YACKX's maximum drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCIX and YACKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCIX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.74% | -46.65% | -3.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.91% | -6.86% | -12.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.48% | -13.66% | -15.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.51% | -19.86% | -20.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.51% | -30.93% | -9.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.20% | -2.53% | -2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.59% | -5.10% | -6.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.87% | 2.49% | +3.38% |
Volatility
TSCIX vs. YACKX - Volatility Comparison
AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCIX) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) at 2.54%. This indicates that TSCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YACKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSCIX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 2.54% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.14% | 9.62% | +6.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.50% | 11.62% | +9.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 12.92% | +10.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.64% | 13.78% | +9.86% |
TSCIX vs. YACKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSCIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than YACKX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSCIX vs. YACKX - Dividend Comparison
TSCIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YACKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSCIX AMG TimesSquare Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 6.63% | 22.45% | 13.38% | 22.41% | 30.72% | 10.75% | 3.70% | 11.91% |
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 15.11% | 17.75% | 9.70% | 4.39% | 7.35% | 3.72% | 10.82% | 9.31% | 23.06% | 10.67% | 8.57% | 13.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSCIX and YACKX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSCIX has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to YACKX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSCIX dropped -49.74% vs YACKX's -46.65%.
YACKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSCIX and YACKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer