PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSCDY vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TSCDY vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tesco PLC (TSCDY) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSCDY achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 9.45% return. Over the past 10 years, TSCDY has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 16.93%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 30.17% annualized return.


TSCDY

1D
-1.06%
1M
-4.46%
YTD
0.70%
6M
1.10%
1Y
11.36%
3Y*
27.81%
5Y*
18.14%
10Y*
16.93%

AAPL

1D
-0.34%
1M
-3.82%
YTD
9.45%
6M
9.81%
1Y
48.35%
3Y*
17.28%
5Y*
17.91%
10Y*
30.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSCDY vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSCDY
Tesco PLC
0.70%32.85%30.49%43.52%-29.02%65.48%0.16%41.74%-12.38%12.46%
AAPL
Apple Inc
9.45%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Correlation

The correlation between TSCDY and AAPL is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.24

The correlation between TSCDY and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TSCDY:

$37.63B

AAPL:

$4.39T

EPS

TSCDY:

£1.61

AAPL:

$8.24

PE Ratio

TSCDY:

8.33

AAPL:

36.06

PEG Ratio

TSCDY:

0.31

AAPL:

4.74

PS Ratio

TSCDY:

0.20

AAPL:

9.79

PB Ratio

TSCDY:

2.48

AAPL:

41.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

TSCDY:

£143.57B

AAPL:

$451.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TSCDY:

£10.62B

AAPL:

$216.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

TSCDY:

£9.46B

AAPL:

$153.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSCDY vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSCDY
TSCDY Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
TSCDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSCDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSCDY Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TSCDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSCDY Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSCDY vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tesco PLC (TSCDY) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSCDYAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.39

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

3.52

-2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.02

8.68

-6.65

TSCDY vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSCDY Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSCDY and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSCDY vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSCDY drawdown since its inception was -76.10%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCDY and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSCDYAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.10%

-81.80%

+5.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.25%

-13.80%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.37%

-33.36%

+14.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.56%

-33.36%

-12.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.56%

-38.52%

-7.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.45%

-5.77%

-5.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.78%

-29.58%

-13.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

5.59%

+0.04%

Volatility

TSCDY vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Tesco PLC (TSCDY) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 7.01%. This indicates that TSCDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSCDYAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.47%

7.01%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.40%

16.59%

+1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.92%

22.59%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.24%

27.52%

-4.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.77%

28.94%

-1.17%

Dividends

TSCDY vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

TSCDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than AAPL's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.35%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
TSCDY
Tesco PLC
3.00%3.08%3.39%3.60%5.27%20.15%3.79%2.56%2.05%0.47%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TSCDY vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tesco PLC and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B140.00B20222023202420252026
37.62B
111.18B
(TSCDY) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TSCDY values in GBP, AAPL values in USD

TSCDY vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tesco PLC and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
7.3%
49.3%
Portfolio components
TSCDY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesco PLC reported a gross profit of 2.75B and revenue of 37.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.3%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

TSCDY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesco PLC reported an operating income of 1.49B and revenue of 37.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

TSCDY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesco PLC reported a net income of 835.66M and revenue of 37.62B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TSCDY and AAPL have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSCDY has higher volatility (7.47%) compared to AAPL (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSCDY dropped -76.10% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSCDY and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer