TRXAX vs. CLTAX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TRXAX (Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund) and CLTAX (Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation Fund) are both mutual funds - TRXAX is a Global Allocation fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds, while CLTAX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. Over the past 10 years, TRXAX returned 5.61%/yr vs 7.61%/yr for CLTAX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRXAX charges 1.22%/yr vs 1.53%/yr for CLTAX.

Performance

TRXAX vs. CLTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX) and Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation Fund (CLTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRXAX achieves a 6.09% return, which is significantly lower than CLTAX's 10.85% return. Over the past 10 years, TRXAX has underperformed CLTAX with an annualized return of 5.61%, while CLTAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.61% annualized return.

TRXAX

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 1.20%
• YTD: 6.09%
• 6M: 6.38%
• 1Y: 14.08%
• 3Y*: 10.09%
• 5Y*: 4.86%
• 10Y*: 5.61%

CLTAX

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 2.27%
• YTD: 10.85%
• 6M: 8.66%
• 1Y: 24.72%
• 3Y*: 12.94%
• 5Y*: 3.27%
• 10Y*: 7.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRXAX vs. CLTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TRXAX Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund	6.09%	16.16%	4.67%	5.23%	-7.44%	9.65%	3.62%	11.51%	-3.30%	11.12%
CLTAX Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation Fund	10.85%	15.26%	3.51%	10.16%	-24.36%	17.82%	27.88%	2.80%	-4.99%	16.74%

Correlation

The correlation between TRXAX and CLTAX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2012	0.64

The correlation between TRXAX and CLTAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TRXAX vs. CLTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRXAX

TRXAX Risk / Return Rank: 56
TRXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
TRXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
TRXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
TRXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
TRXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

CLTAX

CLTAX Risk / Return Rank: 36
CLTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
CLTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
CLTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
CLTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
CLTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRXAX vs. CLTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX) and Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation Fund (CLTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRXAX	CLTAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	1.56	+0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.34	2.19	+1.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.28	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	2.26	+0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.67	10.35	-1.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRXAX vs. CLTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRXAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the CLTAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRXAX and CLTAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRXAX	CLTAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34	1.56	+0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	0.22	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.53	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.62	+0.08

Drawdowns

TRXAX vs. CLTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRXAX drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, smaller than the maximum CLTAX drawdown of -28.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRXAX and CLTAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRXAX	CLTAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.50%	-28.93%	+8.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.60%	-10.91%	+5.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.04%	-16.53%	+10.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.03%	-26.92%	+10.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.50%	-28.93%	+8.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.63%	-0.45%	-1.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.66%	-8.02%	+5.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.64%	2.38%	-0.74%

Volatility

TRXAX vs. CLTAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX) is 1.28%, while Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation Fund (CLTAX) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that TRXAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRXAX	CLTAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.28%	3.70%	-2.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.81%	12.67%	-7.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.09%	15.83%	-9.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.85%	14.66%	-6.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.26%	14.30%	-6.04%

TRXAX vs. CLTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRXAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is lower than CLTAX's 1.53% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRXAX vs. CLTAX - Dividend Comparison

TRXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than CLTAX's 9.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLTAX Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation Fund	9.08%	10.06%	0.02%	1.02%	12.48%	0.55%	3.42%	12.17%	2.73%	2.81%	1.35%	6.33%
TRXAX Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund	2.20%	2.45%	4.93%	5.12%	0.83%	6.76%	1.91%	2.66%	8.34%	3.46%	3.55%	1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRXAX and CLTAX in my portfolio?

TRXAX and CLTAX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRXAX or CLTAX?

CLTAX has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to TRXAX (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRXAX dropped -20.50% vs CLTAX's -28.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.