TRX vs. AEE
TRX (Tanzanian Gold Corporation) and AEE (Ameren Corporation) are both stocks. TRX operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while AEE operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, TRX returned -5.87%/yr vs 10.88%/yr for AEE. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TRX vs. AEE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRX achieves a -15.81% return, which is significantly lower than AEE's 11.29% return. Over the past 10 years, TRX has underperformed AEE with an annualized return of -5.87%, while AEE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.88% annualized return.
TRX
- 1D
- -4.73%
- 1M
- -5.45%
- 6M
- -52.44%
- YTD
- -15.81%
- 1Y
- 121.89%
- 3Y*
- 25.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- -5.87%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.26%
AEE
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- 6M
- 7.60%
- YTD
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 10.40%
- 3Y*
- 12.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.62%
- 10Y*
- 10.88%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $157.21M | $162.44M | $196.49M | |
| $905.56K | $1.06M | $2.02M |
TRX vs. AEE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRX Tanzanian Gold Corporation | -15.81% | 199.97% | -19.24% | 12.37% | -14.54% | -40.00% | 6.40% | 77.14% | 25.00% | -43.99% |
AEE Ameren Corporation | 11.29% | 15.31% | 27.47% | -16.07% | 2.54% | 17.09% | 4.26% | 20.82% | 13.99% | 15.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRX and AEE is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2005 | 0.08 |
The correlation between TRX and AEE shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TRX:
$253.79M
AEE:
$30.33B
TRX:
-CA$0.09
AEE:
$5.67
TRX:
2.17
AEE:
3.45
TRX:
2.53
AEE:
2.23
TRX:
CA$146.64M
AEE:
$8.75B
TRX:
CA$87.23M
AEE:
$1.49B
TRX:
CA$35.98M
AEE:
$4.18B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRX vs. AEE — Risk / Return Rank
TRX
AEE
TRX vs. AEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tanzanian Gold Corporation (TRX) and Ameren Corporation (AEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRX | AEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.12 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 1.42 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.63 | 3.23 | +0.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRX vs. AEE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRX drawdown since its inception was -97.69%, which is greater than AEE's maximum drawdown of -60.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRX and AEE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRX | AEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.69% | -60.57% | -37.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.17% | -8.09% | -60.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.17% | -16.48% | -51.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.17% | -27.46% | -40.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.34% | -29.09% | -50.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.26% | -7.36% | -83.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.25% | -11.67% | -60.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.24% | 3.56% | +29.68% |
Volatility
TRX vs. AEE - Volatility Comparison
Tanzanian Gold Corporation (TRX) has a higher volatility of 22.42% compared to Ameren Corporation (AEE) at 6.21%. This indicates that TRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRX | AEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.42% | 6.21% | +16.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.57% | 14.21% | +49.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.72% | 17.18% | +75.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.06% | 19.43% | +41.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.88% | 21.92% | +47.96% |
Dividends
TRX vs. AEE - Dividend Comparison
TRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEE Ameren Corporation | 2.66% | 2.84% | 3.01% | 3.48% | 2.65% | 2.47% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.83% | 3.01% | 4.08% | 3.83% |
TRX Tanzanian Gold Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TRX vs. AEE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tanzanian Gold Corporation and Ameren Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TRX vs. AEE - Profitability Comparison
TRX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tanzanian Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 19.45M and revenue of 32.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.2%.
AEE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ameren Corporation reported a gross profit of -1.08B and revenue of 2.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -51.7%.
TRX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tanzanian Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 15.71M and revenue of 32.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 47.8%.
AEE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ameren Corporation reported an operating income of 459.00M and revenue of 2.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.9%.
TRX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tanzanian Gold Corporation reported a net income of 2.84M and revenue of 32.85M, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.
AEE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ameren Corporation reported a net income of 314.00M and revenue of 2.09B, resulting in a net margin of 15.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TRX and AEE have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRX has higher volatility (22.42%) compared to AEE (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRX dropped -97.69% vs AEE's -60.57%.
TRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRX and AEE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer