PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRUT vs. CHAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRUT vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRUT achieves a 20.96% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 52.78% return.


TRUT

1D
4.22%
1M
5.66%
6M
25.56%
YTD
20.96%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

CHAT

1D
5.60%
1M
1.45%
6M
45.53%
YTD
52.78%
1Y
81.24%
3Y*
46.50%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
49.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$66.18M$57.28M$66.34M
$14.52M$8.92M$6.31M

TRUT vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TRUT and CHAT is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025

0.84

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRUT vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TRUT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CHAT
CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TRUT vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRUTCHATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.02

TRUT vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRUT vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRUT drawdown since its inception was -18.55%, smaller than the maximum CHAT drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUT and CHAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRUTCHATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.55%

-31.34%

+12.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.87%

-13.44%

+8.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-5.75%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.13%

Volatility

TRUT vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRUTCHATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.13%

39.59%

-15.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.13%

32.59%

-8.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.13%

32.59%

-8.46%

TRUT vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRUT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRUT vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

TRUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than CHAT's 1.87% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TRUT and CHAT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.

CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 0.30% for TRUT.

TRUT is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHAT is Artificial Intelligence. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for TRUT and 0.75% for CHAT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRUT and CHAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer