TRUF vs. FDFF
TRUF (VanEck Financials TruSector ETF) and FDFF (Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRUF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FDFF.
Performance
TRUF vs. FDFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TRUF
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 4.40%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDFF
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 6.40%
- 6M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- -1.27%
- 1Y
- -9.10%
- 3Y*
- 10.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRUF vs. FDFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 15.11% |
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF | 12.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRUF and FDFF is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRUF vs. FDFF — Risk / Return Rank
TRUF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDFF
TRUF vs. FDFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF) and Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF (FDFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRUF | FDFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.93 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.41 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.77 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRUF vs. FDFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRUF drawdown since its inception was -3.24%, smaller than the maximum FDFF drawdown of -23.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUF and FDFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRUF | FDFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -23.06% | +19.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -22.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -10.33% | +9.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.07% | -6.62% | +5.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.83% | — |
Volatility
TRUF vs. FDFF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRUF | FDFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.68% | 18.45% | -4.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 18.97% | -5.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 18.97% | -5.29% |
TRUF vs. FDFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRUF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FDFF's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRUF vs. FDFF - Dividend Comparison
TRUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than FDFF's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FDFF Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF | 1.00% | 0.86% | 0.70% | 0.27% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRUF and FDFF have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDFF.
FDFF has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.36% for TRUF.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TRUF and 0.50% for FDFF.
Find the right allocation for TRUF and FDFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer