TRUF vs. BDCZ

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

TRUF (VanEck Financials TruSector ETF) and BDCZ (ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN) are both Financials Equities funds. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRUF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BDCZ.

Performance

TRUF vs. BDCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF) and ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TRUF

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 4.40%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDCZ

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: 4.53%
• 6M: -4.04%
• YTD: -4.35%
• 1Y: -13.11%
• 3Y*: 3.75%
• 5Y*: 4.47%
• 10Y*: 6.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRUF vs. BDCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF	15.11%
BDCZ ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN	6.21%

Correlation

The correlation between TRUF and BDCZ is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026	0.44

Return for Risk

TRUF vs. BDCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRUF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BDCZ

BDCZ Risk / Return Rank: 4
BDCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
BDCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BDCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BDCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BDCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRUF vs. BDCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF) and ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN (BDCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TRUF	BDCZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.59	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.72	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.92	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.68	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.12	—

Drawdowns

TRUF vs. BDCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRUF drawdown since its inception was -3.24%, smaller than the maximum BDCZ drawdown of -55.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUF and BDCZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRUF	BDCZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.24%	-55.63%	+52.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-19.47%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-55.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	-14.00%	+13.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.07%	-7.95%	+6.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	12.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TRUF	BDCZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.88%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	18.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.68%	22.50%	-8.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.68%	18.25%	-4.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.68%	21.94%	-8.26%

TRUF vs. BDCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRUF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BDCZ's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRUF vs. BDCZ - Dividend Comparison

TRUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than BDCZ's 11.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BDCZ ETRACS MVIS Business Development Companies Index ETN	11.84%	10.65%	9.26%	9.13%	9.39%	7.49%	10.01%	8.40%	9.66%	8.74%	7.98%
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRUF and BDCZ in my portfolio?

TRUF and BDCZ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TRUF or BDCZ?

On fees, TRUF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRUF or BDCZ?

TRUF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BDCZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TRUF or BDCZ?

BDCZ has the higher dividend yield at 11.84%, compared with 0.36% for TRUF.

What is the main difference between TRUF and BDCZ?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TRUF and 0.85% for BDCZ.