TRU vs. HON

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about TransUnion (TRU) and Honeywell International Inc (HON).

Performance

TRU vs. HON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TransUnion (TRU) and Honeywell International Inc (HON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TRU vs. HON - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TRU TransUnion	-19.64%	-7.01%	35.59%	21.85%	-51.90%	19.91%	16.30%	51.34%	3.69%	77.69%
HON Honeywell International Inc	17.55%	-6.37%	10.02%	0.02%	4.90%	-0.29%	22.97%	36.70%	-8.27%	35.10%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TRU : $13.41B HON : $145.73B
EPS TRU : $2.32 HON : $8.04
PE Ratio TRU : 29.67 HON : 28.39
PEG Ratio TRU : 0.42 HON : 50.60
PS Ratio TRU : 2.95 HON : 3.62
PB Ratio TRU : 3.02 HON : 6.64
Total Revenue (TTM) TRU : $4.58B HON : $40.34B
Gross Profit (TTM) TRU : $2.42B HON : $14.90B
EBITDA (TTM) TRU : $1.46B HON : $9.12B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRU achieves a -19.64% return, which is significantly lower than HON's 17.55% return. Over the past 10 years, TRU has underperformed HON with an annualized return of 9.86%, while HON has yielded a comparatively higher 10.62% annualized return.

TRU

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -12.16%
• YTD: -19.64%
• 6M: -16.11%
• 1Y: -17.49%
• 3Y*: 4.02%
• 5Y*: -5.21%
• 10Y*: 9.86%

HON

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: -8.00%
• YTD: 17.55%
• 6M: 16.46%
• 1Y: 15.86%
• 3Y*: 10.55%
• 5Y*: 4.35%
• 10Y*: 10.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TRU vs. HON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRU

TRU Risk / Return Rank: 23
TRU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
TRU Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
TRU Omega Ratio Rank: 23
TRU Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
TRU Martin Ratio Rank: 22

HON

HON Risk / Return Rank: 59
HON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
HON Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
HON Omega Ratio Rank: 56
HON Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
HON Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRU vs. HON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TransUnion (TRU) and Honeywell International Inc (HON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRU	HON	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.38	0.63	-1.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.26	1.07	-1.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.14	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.50	1.05	-1.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.06	1.92	-2.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRU vs. HON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRU Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the HON Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRU and HON, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRU	HON	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.38	0.63	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.14	0.20	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.46	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.28	+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between TRU and HON is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TRU vs. HON - Dividend Comparison

TRU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than HON's 1.98% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TRU TransUnion	0.68%	0.54%	0.45%	0.61%	0.70%	0.30%	0.30%	0.35%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HON Honeywell International Inc	1.98%	2.25%	1.93%	1.99%	1.85%	1.81%	1.71%	1.90%	2.24%	1.79%	2.11%	2.07%

Drawdowns

TRU vs. HON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRU drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, smaller than the maximum HON drawdown of -70.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRU and HON.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRU	HON	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.92%	-70.09%	+5.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.43%	-16.03%	-17.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.92%	-27.13%	-37.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.92%	-43.01%	-21.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.49%	-8.00%	-35.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.96%	-20.31%	+2.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.72%	8.73%	+6.99%

Volatility

TRU vs. HON - Volatility Comparison

TransUnion (TRU) has a higher volatility of 10.67% compared to Honeywell International Inc (HON) at 6.54%. This indicates that TRU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRU	HON	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.67%	6.54%	+4.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.56%	16.35%	+14.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.10%	25.40%	+20.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.03%	21.39%	+16.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.47%	23.26%	+11.21%

Financials

TRU vs. HON - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TransUnion and Honeywell International Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TRU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TransUnion reported a gross profit of 695.20M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.

HON - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Honeywell International Inc reported a gross profit of 3.47B and revenue of 9.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.6%.

TRU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TransUnion reported an operating income of 203.60M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

HON - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Honeywell International Inc reported an operating income of 996.00M and revenue of 9.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.2%.

TRU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, TransUnion reported a net income of 101.20M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.

HON - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Honeywell International Inc reported a net income of 295.00M and revenue of 9.76B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.