PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRU vs. MCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TRU vs. MCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TransUnion (TRU) and Moody's Corporation (MCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRU achieves a -18.80% return, which is significantly lower than MCO's -11.83% return. Over the past 10 years, TRU has underperformed MCO with an annualized return of 8.20%, while MCO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.48% annualized return.


TRU

1D
-5.91%
1M
0.67%
YTD
-18.80%
6M
-16.50%
1Y
-18.05%
3Y*
-1.77%
5Y*
-7.58%
10Y*
8.20%

MCO

1D
-1.15%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
-11.83%
6M
-8.45%
1Y
-6.21%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
17.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRU vs. MCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRU
TransUnion
-18.80%-7.01%35.59%21.85%-51.90%19.91%16.30%51.34%3.69%77.69%
MCO
Moody's Corporation
-11.83%8.74%22.17%41.52%-27.80%35.57%23.26%71.26%-4.10%58.53%

Correlation

The correlation between TRU and MCO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2015

0.57

The correlation between TRU and MCO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TRU:

$13.51B

MCO:

$79.50B

EPS

TRU:

$3.59

MCO:

$13.92

PE Ratio

TRU:

19.30

MCO:

32.20

PEG Ratio

TRU:

0.27

MCO:

4.20

PS Ratio

TRU:

2.88

MCO:

10.20

PB Ratio

TRU:

2.84

MCO:

26.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

TRU:

$4.73B

MCO:

$7.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TRU:

$2.49B

MCO:

$5.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

TRU:

$1.46B

MCO:

$3.95B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRU vs. MCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRU
TRU Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TRU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRU Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
TRU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRU Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

MCO
MCO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRU vs. MCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TransUnion (TRU) and Moody's Corporation (MCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRUMCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.98

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

-0.26

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.94

-0.58

-0.36

TRU vs. MCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRU Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the MCO Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRU and MCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRUMCODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.46

-0.24

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

0.26

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.63

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.48

-0.19

Drawdowns

TRU vs. MCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRU drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, smaller than the maximum MCO drawdown of -78.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRU and MCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRUMCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.92%

-78.72%

+13.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.43%

-23.61%

-9.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.27%

-24.65%

-22.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.92%

-41.66%

-23.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.92%

-42.02%

-22.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.90%

-16.53%

-26.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.33%

-17.73%

-0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.16%

10.64%

+8.52%

Volatility

TRU vs. MCO - Volatility Comparison

TransUnion (TRU) has a higher volatility of 12.28% compared to Moody's Corporation (MCO) at 7.54%. This indicates that TRU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRUMCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.28%

7.54%

+4.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.22%

21.91%

+8.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.02%

26.23%

+12.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.47%

26.31%

+12.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.69%

27.84%

+6.85%

Dividends

TRU vs. MCO - Dividend Comparison

TRU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than MCO's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCO
Moody's Corporation
0.88%0.74%0.72%0.79%1.26%0.63%0.77%0.84%1.26%1.03%1.57%1.36%
TRU
TransUnion
0.69%0.54%0.45%0.61%0.70%0.30%0.30%0.35%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TRU vs. MCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TransUnion and Moody's Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.25B
2.08B
(TRU) Total Revenue
(MCO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TRU vs. MCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TransUnion and Moody's Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%20222023202420252026
58.3%
74.5%
Portfolio components
TRU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TransUnion reported a gross profit of 726.20M and revenue of 1.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.3%.

MCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Moody's Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.55B and revenue of 2.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.5%.

TRU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TransUnion reported an operating income of 244.80M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.7%.

MCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Moody's Corporation reported an operating income of 922.00M and revenue of 2.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 44.4%.

TRU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TransUnion reported a net income of 397.20M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in a net margin of 31.9%.

MCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Moody's Corporation reported a net income of 661.00M and revenue of 2.08B, resulting in a net margin of 31.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TRU and MCO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRU has higher volatility (12.28%) compared to MCO (7.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRU dropped -64.92% vs MCO's -78.72%.

MCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRU and MCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer