PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRSX.L vs. TRSG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRSX.L vs. TRSG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRSX.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRSG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TRSX.L is traded in USD, while TRSG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the TRSG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRSX.L achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly higher than TRSG.L's -0.33% return.


TRSX.L

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
-0.58%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
2.70%
5Y*
-0.98%
10Y*

TRSG.L

1D
0.25%
1M
0.26%
YTD
-0.33%
6M
0.16%
1Y
3.56%
3Y*
2.84%
5Y*
-0.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRSX.L vs. TRSG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TRSX.L
SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
-0.05%8.02%-0.62%3.29%-14.99%-2.94%9.77%4.50%
TRSG.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
-0.33%6.57%0.87%3.31%-12.35%-2.02%7.32%7.72%

Correlation

The correlation between TRSX.L and TRSG.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2019

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRSX.L vs. TRSG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRSX.L
TRSX.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
TRSX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRSX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

TRSG.L
TRSG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TRSG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRSG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRSG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
TRSG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRSG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRSX.L vs. TRSG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRSX.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRSG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRSX.LTRSG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.12

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

1.16

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.19

3.39

+0.80

TRSX.L vs. TRSG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRSX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the TRSG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRSX.L and TRSG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRSX.LTRSG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

0.69

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

-0.05

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.18

-0.03

Drawdowns

TRSX.L vs. TRSG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRSX.L drawdown since its inception was -23.50%, which is greater than TRSG.L's maximum drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRSX.L and TRSG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRSX.LTRSG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.50%

-19.16%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.05%

-3.07%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.35%

-5.41%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.96%

-16.62%

-4.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.55%

-7.17%

-3.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.02%

-8.25%

-2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

1.05%

+1.20%

Volatility

TRSX.L vs. TRSG.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRSX.L) has a higher volatility of 1.87% compared to Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRSG.L) at 1.62%. This indicates that TRSX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRSG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRSX.LTRSG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.87%

1.62%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.46%

3.81%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.73%

5.12%

+0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.52%

7.05%

+6.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.53%

7.22%

+6.31%

TRSX.L vs. TRSG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRSX.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TRSG.L's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRSX.L vs. TRSG.L - Dividend Comparison

TRSX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than TRSG.L's 4.24% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
TRSG.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
4.24%4.22%4.16%3.85%1.94%1.12%1.69%2.01%
TRSX.L
SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
4.09%3.93%3.59%2.71%1.65%1.02%1.56%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRSX.L and TRSG.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRSX.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRSX.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for TRSG.L.

TRSX.L tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index, while TRSG.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for TRSX.L and 0.06% for TRSG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRSX.L and TRSG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer