TRSG.L vs. EQGB.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF A (TRSG.L) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L).
TRSG.L and EQGB.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TRSG.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government TR USD. It was launched on Jan 11, 2019. EQGB.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Oct 17, 2017. Both TRSG.L and EQGB.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
TRSG.L vs. EQGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRSG.L vs. EQGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRSG.L Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF A | 0.91% | -0.91% | 2.57% | -1.87% | -1.86% | -1.12% | 4.13% | 4.56% |
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc | -5.40% | 19.59% | 26.12% | 53.92% | -35.07% | 27.68% | 45.43% | 30.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRSG.L achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly higher than EQGB.L's -5.40% return.
TRSG.L
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 0.01%
- 3Y*
- 0.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.58%
- 10Y*
- —
EQGB.L
- 1D
- 3.41%
- 1M
- -3.13%
- YTD
- -5.40%
- 6M
- -2.55%
- 1Y
- 23.58%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRSG.L vs. EQGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRSG.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than EQGB.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRSG.L vs. EQGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
TRSG.L
EQGB.L
TRSG.L vs. EQGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF A (TRSG.L) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRSG.L | EQGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | 1.16 | -1.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.05 | 1.75 | -1.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.23 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.06 | 2.04 | -1.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.11 | 7.34 | -7.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRSG.L | EQGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 | 1.16 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.57 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.78 | -0.69 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRSG.L and EQGB.L is -0.32. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
TRSG.L vs. EQGB.L - Dividend Comparison
TRSG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, while EQGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRSG.L Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF A | 4.20% | 4.22% | 4.16% | 3.85% | 1.94% | 1.12% | 1.69% | 2.01% |
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% |
Drawdowns
TRSG.L vs. EQGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRSG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.68%, smaller than the maximum EQGB.L drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRSG.L and EQGB.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRSG.L | EQGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.68% | -36.77% | +13.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.38% | -12.60% | +5.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.12% | -36.77% | +20.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.85% | -7.87% | -9.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.39% | -7.64% | -7.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.26% | 3.14% | +1.12% |
Volatility
TRSG.L vs. EQGB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF A (TRSG.L) is 2.06%, while Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) has a volatility of 6.14%. This indicates that TRSG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRSG.L | EQGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.06% | 6.14% | -4.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.49% | 12.05% | -7.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.17% | 20.37% | -13.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.76% | 20.95% | -12.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.49% | 21.30% | -11.81% |