PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRSPX vs. NZF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRSPX vs. NZF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen S&P 500 Index Fund Retirement Class (TRSPX) and Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund (NZF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRSPX achieves a 11.56% return, which is significantly higher than NZF's 2.37% return. Over the past 10 years, TRSPX has outperformed NZF with an annualized return of 15.14%, while NZF has yielded a comparatively lower 3.56% annualized return.


TRSPX

1D
0.12%
1M
5.77%
YTD
11.56%
6M
11.55%
1Y
28.56%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
13.95%
10Y*
15.14%

NZF

1D
-0.87%
1M
1.29%
YTD
2.37%
6M
1.64%
1Y
14.20%
3Y*
10.44%
5Y*
-0.15%
10Y*
3.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRSPX vs. NZF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRSPX
Nuveen S&P 500 Index Fund Retirement Class
11.56%17.50%24.64%25.90%-18.34%28.32%18.08%31.06%-4.72%19.52%
NZF
Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund
2.37%11.78%10.09%2.49%-25.53%11.19%3.58%28.33%-6.79%14.48%

Correlation

The correlation between TRSPX and NZF is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2002

0.15

The correlation between TRSPX and NZF shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.31 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRSPX vs. NZF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRSPX
TRSPX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TRSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TRSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

NZF
NZF Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
NZF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NZF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
NZF Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
NZF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
NZF Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRSPX vs. NZF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen S&P 500 Index Fund Retirement Class (TRSPX) and Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund (NZF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRSPXNZFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.26

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

1.76

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.39

7.24

+8.16

TRSPX vs. NZF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRSPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the NZF Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRSPX and NZF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRSPXNZFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

1.38

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

-0.01

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.27

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.37

+0.21

Drawdowns

TRSPX vs. NZF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRSPX drawdown since its inception was -55.34%, which is greater than NZF's maximum drawdown of -48.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRSPX and NZF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRSPXNZFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.34%

-48.55%

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-8.11%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-15.59%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.63%

-37.42%

+12.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.77%

-37.42%

+3.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.72%

+4.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.90%

-7.77%

+0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.97%

-0.06%

Volatility

TRSPX vs. NZF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen S&P 500 Index Fund Retirement Class (TRSPX) is 2.82%, while Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund (NZF) has a volatility of 3.51%. This indicates that TRSPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NZF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRSPXNZFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

3.51%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

8.14%

+0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.87%

10.34%

+1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

12.37%

+4.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.06%

13.10%

+4.96%

TRSPX vs. NZF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRSPX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than NZF's 1.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRSPX vs. NZF - Dividend Comparison

TRSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than NZF's 7.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NZF
Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund
7.64%7.58%6.84%4.51%5.80%4.63%4.74%4.82%6.05%5.86%6.26%5.50%
TRSPX
Nuveen S&P 500 Index Fund Retirement Class
1.93%2.15%1.30%1.26%1.66%1.55%1.33%1.95%2.67%0.36%2.18%0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRSPX and NZF have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NZF has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to TRSPX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRSPX dropped -55.34% vs NZF's -48.55%.

TRSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRSPX and NZF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer