PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRS5.L vs. VDTA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRS5.L vs. VDTA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRS5.L) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VDTA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRS5.L achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than VDTA.L's -0.22% return.


TRS5.L

1D
0.18%
1M
-0.04%
6M
0.15%
YTD
-0.24%
1Y
3.04%
3Y*
3.76%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*
1.24%

VDTA.L

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.29%
6M
0.07%
YTD
-0.22%
1Y
3.38%
3Y*
2.87%
5Y*
-0.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRS5.L vs. VDTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TRS5.L
SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
-0.24%7.28%2.01%4.18%-9.49%-2.44%6.78%4.99%
VDTA.L
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
-0.22%6.24%0.94%3.71%-12.37%-2.33%7.64%6.37%

Correlation

The correlation between TRS5.L and VDTA.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2019

0.91

The correlation between TRS5.L and VDTA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRS5.L vs. VDTA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRS5.L
TRS5.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
TRS5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRS5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRS5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TRS5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRS5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

VDTA.L
VDTA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VDTA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDTA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDTA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VDTA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDTA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRS5.L vs. VDTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRS5.L) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VDTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRS5.LVDTA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.17

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

1.16

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.17

3.09

+0.08

TRS5.L vs. VDTA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRS5.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the VDTA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRS5.L and VDTA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRS5.L vs. VDTA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRS5.L drawdown since its inception was -14.35%, smaller than the maximum VDTA.L drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRS5.L and VDTA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRS5.LVDTA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.35%

-18.80%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.50%

-2.89%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.72%

-4.97%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.64%

-16.39%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-6.96%

+5.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.77%

-8.07%

+4.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.09%

-0.13%

Volatility

TRS5.L vs. VDTA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRS5.L) is 0.83%, while Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VDTA.L) has a volatility of 1.00%. This indicates that TRS5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDTA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRS5.LVDTA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

1.00%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.20%

2.62%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89%

3.53%

-0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.72%

5.58%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.77%

5.32%

-1.55%

TRS5.L vs. VDTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TRS5.L and VDTA.L have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRS5.L vs. VDTA.L - Dividend Comparison

TRS5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, while VDTA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
TRS5.L
SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
3.92%3.68%3.24%1.97%1.12%0.98%1.66%2.13%1.66%1.40%0.47%
VDTA.L
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, TRS5.L and VDTA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRS5.L and VDTA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.

TRS5.L tracks Bloomberg US 3-7 Year Treasury Bond Index, while VDTA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate US Treasury Float Adjusted index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRS5.L and VDTA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer