VDTA.L vs. CBU0.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDTA.L) and iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE).
VDTA.L and CBU0.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VDTA.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate US Treasury Float Adjusted index. It was launched on Feb 8, 2022. CBU0.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the iBoxx® GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap (EUR Hedged). It was launched on Mar 22, 2023. Both VDTA.L and CBU0.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
VDTA.L vs. CBU0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VDTA.L vs. CBU0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VDTA.L Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | -0.17% | 6.25% | 0.93% | 0.16% |
CBU0.DE iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -3.03% | 18.07% | -5.96% | 7.78% |
Different Trading Currencies
VDTA.L is traded in USD, while CBU0.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CBU0.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDTA.L achieves a -0.17% return, which is significantly higher than CBU0.DE's -3.03% return.
VDTA.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- -0.17%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 2.97%
- 3Y*
- 2.65%
- 5Y*
- -0.23%
- 10Y*
- —
CBU0.DE
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- YTD
- -3.03%
- 6M
- -0.96%
- 1Y
- 10.52%
- 3Y*
- 4.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VDTA.L vs. CBU0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDTA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CBU0.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
VDTA.L vs. CBU0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
VDTA.L
CBU0.DE
VDTA.L vs. CBU0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDTA.L) and iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VDTA.L | CBU0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.70 | 1.00 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.00 | 1.52 | -0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.19 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | 1.33 | -0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.81 | 4.58 | -2.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VDTA.L | CBU0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 1.00 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.51 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between VDTA.L and CBU0.DE is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
VDTA.L vs. CBU0.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither VDTA.L nor CBU0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
VDTA.L vs. CBU0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDTA.L drawdown since its inception was -18.82%, which is greater than CBU0.DE's maximum drawdown of -11.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDTA.L and CBU0.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDTA.L | CBU0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.82% | -6.02% | -12.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.28% | -4.20% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.92% | -2.88% | -4.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.13% | -1.59% | -6.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.28% | 1.06% | +0.22% |
Volatility
VDTA.L vs. CBU0.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDTA.L) is 1.33%, while iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that VDTA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBU0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VDTA.L | CBU0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.33% | 3.92% | -2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | 6.05% | -3.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.19% | 10.43% | -6.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.55% | 9.87% | -4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.38% | 9.87% | -4.49% |